What's new

Following 2016 potential draftees

We NEED to move Hayward to become, eventually, competitive.
Probably add Favors to that as well.

Mostly Hayward, though.

Let's not create this little clique club, let's compete.
 
You know how many nuts the Cavs would give to have Derrick Favors or Gordon Hayward on their team right now?

Both of Love's nuts and every future pick they have.
 
You are working towards retard homer status. I used to respect your takes.

Says the guy who is advocating trading our best player for a player that went to the school that he is a booster for. Yeah no bias homerism exist in that take.
 
Says the guy who is advocating trading our best player for a player that went to the school that he is a booster for. Yeah no bias homerism exist in that take.

I've been fair on this board for years. You post junk (and of lesser quality than what our current PG posts).
 
We NEED to move Hayward to become, eventually, competitive.
Probably add Favors to that as well.

Mostly Hayward, though.

Let's not create this little clique club, let's compete.

This post isnt fair or intelligent at all. It implies that Hayward and Favors are holding us back from being competitive, which is completely false. Nothing about their play has held us back. What has held us back is being in a rebuilding state and focusing on developing other players around them instead of aggressively pursuing talent that compliments them and is already playing at a high level.
 
Clearly.

Hayward is better player than Murray. I'm sorry if you disagree with something that is so readily apparent.

Why?

Hayward shoots average.
Handles average.
Rebounds average.
Paid max.

I love Hayward, I do, but trying to understand the sacred cow thing.
 
Back
Top