Move On From Hayward?
- Thread starter LoPo
- Start date
FalseFlagg K
Well-Known Member
hmmm i really would like to see how Draymond would do in another team where he played with sucky guards
move on from this thread plz
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
He'd still be one of the most unique players in the game with his defensive ability and skill set, he'd still get open looks because he's guarded by bigs most of the time, his drive and dish game would still exist if he's a threat, and his IQ, understanding, instincts, and fire would still exist. Everyone benefits from playing on that team and in that system, but Draymond Green is so much more than numbers.
Harrison Barnes is hardly more than his numbers. His ability to positionally shift is what makes him worth a damn, and that's useless on this team.
LoPo
Well-Known Member
I cannot believe that there are people on this thread who actually believe that Gordon Hayward is better than Draymond Green. I hate Draymond Green, but the guy can do it all. He can defend 5 positions. He can shoot, pass, and rebound. Yes, Draymond gets to play with those stars. However, those stars wouldn't be as good without Draymond.
And Hayward? C'mon, the guy is good but c'mon. He has had the ability to be "the man" the last two years. The ball is in his hands almost every possession. He gets to shoot, pass, drive, etc. all he pretty much wants. He has the best rim protecting pair in the league behind him. He has an up and coming wing next to him. And you know what, he hasn't led us to the playoffs or a .500 record the last two years. When you get that many touches in 36mpg, you better score 19.7ppg. At some level, you have to realize that somebody has to score. Even the worst teams in the league have guys who average 18+ points because somebody has to score. Every team averages 90ppg. Somebody will score.
If Hayward was on GS, he would not be Draymond. He would probably be Barnes but stick more on the perimeter because he can't guard PF's regularly.
And Hayward? C'mon, the guy is good but c'mon. He has had the ability to be "the man" the last two years. The ball is in his hands almost every possession. He gets to shoot, pass, drive, etc. all he pretty much wants. He has the best rim protecting pair in the league behind him. He has an up and coming wing next to him. And you know what, he hasn't led us to the playoffs or a .500 record the last two years. When you get that many touches in 36mpg, you better score 19.7ppg. At some level, you have to realize that somebody has to score. Even the worst teams in the league have guys who average 18+ points because somebody has to score. Every team averages 90ppg. Somebody will score.
If Hayward was on GS, he would not be Draymond. He would probably be Barnes but stick more on the perimeter because he can't guard PF's regularly.
Maneesh
Well-Known Member
Well I know you like Green and I can take Favors over Green. Its true. Please don't be disgrace ok?
LoPo
Well-Known Member
Disgrace? What are you talking about? Is having an opinion a disgrace?
I've been here for a few days and it seems very obvious that some people are willing to crap on some people but others are so super sensitive. What gives?
Maneesh
Well-Known Member
Quit try trade jazz hero player ok? SHAME!
RandyForRubio
Well-Known Member
Who is saying Hayward is better than Green?
Hayward and Green are different player entirely, hard to even compare.
Green would not play Hayward's role better than Hayward, and same goes for Hayward in Green's role.
Green would not play Hayward's role better than Hayward, and same goes for Hayward in Green's role.