NAOS
Well-Known Member
99% of this board thinks they're smarter than our front office/coaching staff, it's kinda cute.
what do you consider yourself when you state a preference for a Hill-for-Hayward trade instead of for #12?
99% of this board thinks they're smarter than our front office/coaching staff, it's kinda cute.
Bake
Cake
bukkake
Haven't you guys figured out, yet, what's going on within the front office?
One day when? When he is in his 3rd or 4th year? Then guess what? He wouldn't be so cheap. Baldwin can certainly be good or better than Hill, but not necessarily in the span if his rookie deal.Hmmm... can't help but think Wade Baldwin could become George Hill one day on a much cheaper contract... but Hill's experience and assured 3pt shooting will surely help us make the playoff next year.
Still would have loved to see Baldwin on our team though.
guaranteed they trade back into the first round to get Furkan.
Hmmm... can't help but think Wade Baldwin could become George Hill one day on a much cheaper contract... but Hill's experience and assured 3pt shooting will surely help us make the playoff next year.
Still would have loved to see Baldwin on our team though.
One day when? When he is in his 3rd or 4th year? Then guess what? He wouldn't be so cheap. Baldwin can certainly be good or better than Hill, but not necessarily in the span if his rookie deal.
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
One day when? When he is in his 3rd or 4th year? Then guess what? He wouldn't be so cheap. Baldwin can certainly be good or better than Hill, but not necessarily in the span if his rookie deal.
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Indiana (Hoosiers) has/had a player.
Peter Jurkin.
Yah but after next year we'll REALLY have to dig deep to keep Hill, no? He won't be cheap neither.
Would you rather get a Jurkin or a Furkan? Pretty obvious answer braugh. #BelieveinLyndsey