RandyForRubio
Well-Known Member
The Pacers feel Teague is better than Hill.
They might, but I still think they're wrong. Wouldn't be the first time for either of us.
The Pacers feel Teague is better than Hill.
The way I see it is that while Teague is the better player, Hill is the better overall and more versitile player, and Teague may only be the better pg because of style of play. I've never been very high Teague as a player
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This was literally a bunch of gobbledygook.
Idiot!!
The Pacers feel Teague is better than Hill.
We are still betting on Exum. I think they realize Hill works better with Exum. I see them playing together, and Hill
being a second string if and when Exum explodes. Teague has to be the man, and would not sit for Exum.
The level of Exum delusion around here is insane. If Exum ever explodes it's probably still a ways out. If Exum ever turned into the kind of player Hill is I would be happy. Exum will play back up pg with some minutes at the 2 but he won't be a starter this year unless we are hit with injuries. Hill is a better pg. Hood and Burks are better at the 2. All 3 of those guys will play ahead of Exum clear through the playoffs this season.
The Exum hype is a little over the top. In my mind, he is a rookie again. The first few months will be just shaking off rust. Then you have the mental obstacle of getting over the ACL which can be much longer. I don't see a real strong season, but am still optimistic in the long run he can be a great point guard.
Honestly, I think Hill is a top 15 PG. A guy like that definitely gets us to 50 wins...I mean, look who we've been running out there at PG. will he be a star? Of course not, but he will be incredibly vital.