What's new

Holy piss, the Apollo moon missions were fake?!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh, and what's the minimum compensation you would require to both participate in the conspiracy in the first place and to protect the secrecy of said conspiracy for the rest of your life?

Keeping in mind that to violate the conspiracy would likely bring with a it a good deal of fame and fortune.
 
Keeping in mind that to violate the conspiracy would likely bring with a it a good deal of fame and fortune.

...or death.

Thomas Baron and astronauts killed to keep Apollo program
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfYBJFPuiwE&hl=es&gl=ES

Sacrifice On Pad 34.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipKyUVuQ2Uk


https://theconspiracyzone.podcastpeople.com/posts/27709
(excerpts)
---------------------------------------------
Q: Why do prominent astronomers like Sir Bernard Lovell and Patrick Moore support the Moon landings if they were faked?

A: Scientists and astronomers around the globe know full well that the Moon missions were faked, but rely on NASA to gain access to the vital data beamed back to Earth from the Hubble space telescope. They cannot slag off NASA otherwise NASA would deprive them of this essential information, which they so much require.
---------------------------------------------
Q: What about the vast number of people involved in Apollo, wouldn’t someone have spoken out.

A: Pan’s claim there were half a million people involved in the Apollo program, but that includes all the humble engineers working on machine parts in many companies around the globe. So if someone is making a part in some engineering factory in Seattle, and his boss tells him it’s for the Apollo spacecraft, is that engineer proof the landings took place? No of course it is not proof, and even if that engineer knew they never made it to the Moon, he would still brag to his friends that he made a part that went to the Moon just to make him feel proud in some way or other. Parts for the Apollo program were made at many different factories around the globe. For example the laser reflector supposedly left on the Moon was manufactured in France. NASA collected the unit from the French company, and that was the last they saw of it. It’s probably stashed away in some archive at Langley, but one things for certain it’s not on the Moon. Are those French engineers proof they landed on the Moon? No of course not, as very few, (probably less than 200 people), were actually involved in bringing the whole lot together, so as to minimize what was actually taking place. No need for any of them to speak out because (A) They are 100% patriotic to the USA, and would say nothing that would go against America, even if it were true. (B) They do not need millions of dollars to safeguard their future, as they have already received substantial amounts from NASA just to “keep mum”. Read comments from people who worked on the Apollo program in the APOLLO FEEDBACK section.
------------------------------------------------



The anomalies prove the hoax and wondering how we didn't hear about it doesn't make the anomalies go away. A few people probably did try to speak out but the press would never report it. Here's some stuff about mainstream info.

At about the 30 minute mark of this video a scientist says that science fraud is common.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buosgl6J3Kw

Scientists at the Rand Corporation say that depleted uranium is safe.
https://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/docs/b04151999_bt170-99.htm

There are other scientists who say the opposite.
https://www.google.es/search?q=depleted uranium&tbs=vid:1

It's clear that the government can find scientists willing to sell out and lie.

Here's a scientists who says that it's impossible to get something published in a science journal if it goes against the official version.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bAE7FGdNmA
(00:16 time mark)

added 5-15-14
------------------------------------
Here's another case of official mainstream journals publishing untrue information.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1m3TjokVU4
(1:36:40 time mark)


This means that if there's a scientist who thinks the rocks didn't come from the moon, he'd have a hard time getting his opinion known.

If someone tried to blow the whistle, the press would ignore him or her.
https://www.thismodernworld.org/arc/1993/93short-attention-span.gif
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=&search_query=chomsky+media&aq=f
https://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=ES&hl=es&v=Wi5h3vZl6uo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5rdRlOSBoY
https://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Media/MediaControl_Chomsky.html
https://www.chomsky.info/articles/199710--.htm
https://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Media/media_watch.html
https://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Propaganda/Propaganda_page.html
https://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Media_control_propaganda/Media_Control.html
https://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/official_culture.htm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=ES&hl=es&v=trWcqxrQgcc
https://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Herman /Propaganda_System_One.html
 
What's the minimum benefit enjoyed by a co-conspirator?
 
I got banned from the Clavius forum years ago. I snuck back in yesterday and did some posting. They knew it was me right away but I was able to do some serious posting before I got banned again and they didn't delete the stuff I posted. Here it is. I used the username "Scott".

https://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1147.0
https://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1145.0
https://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1146.0
https://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1149.0

https://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=993.15
(reply #21)

https://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1118.15
(reply #18)

Read that last one until post #26. Jay Windley* destroyed his credibility again. Another pro-Apollo poster agreed with him in post #37. They also maintained that the Chinese spacewalk was real and tried to obfuscate those clear anomalies (see the fourth link). Those people are a joke.


*
https://www.clavius.org/about.html
WTF?
 
I got banned from the Clavius forum years ago. I snuck back in yesterday and did some posting. They knew it was me right away but I was able to do some serious posting before I got banned again and they didn't delete the stuff I posted. Here it is. I used the username "Scott".

https://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1147.0
https://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1145.0
https://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1146.0
https://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1149.0

https://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=993.15
(reply #21)

https://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1118.15
(reply #18)

Read that last one until post #26. Jay Windley* destroyed his credibility again. Another pro-Apollo poster agreed with him in post #37. They also maintained that the Chinese spacewalk was real and tried to obfuscate those clear anomalies (see the fourth link). Those people are a joke.


*
https://www.clavius.org/about.html

Welocme.

I was about to resign my membership on Jazzfanz. alternate theories are too hard for some folks to assimilate. This is where vast calculations of improbabilities far beyond the computing capacities of commenters is sufficient refutation of misunderstood facts however documented and proven.
 
What's the minimum benefit enjoyed by a co-conspirator?

Obviously, you've hit on something here, as demonstrated by the way JF community steered your concerns straight to the talk about hand-jobs, Dutch rudder, and similar values.

That's what I like about JazzFanz.

Relevant discussions.
 
Obviously, you've hit on something here, as demonstrated by the way JF community steered your concerns straight to the talk about hand-jobs, Dutch rudder, and similar values.

That's what I like about JazzFanz.

Relevant discussions.
You and me both brother
 
Well, all I can say is that the Van Allen radiation has nothing to do with any real conspiracy, theory or fact.

Space capsules were re-designed to prevent meaningful effects, fairly easy to do with a layer of plastic under the metal can shell. Early on, flight trajectories minimized the time and intensity of exposure.

All that said, why would any sensible person suppose we would televise the real event and give the Russians or others clues about our technology. It is out of character for our government to risk a catastrophic failure on live TV, so of course NASA filmed a version for public release.
 
Well, all I can say is that the Van Allen radiation has nothing to do with any real conspiracy, theory or fact.

Space capsules were re-designed to prevent meaningful effects, fairly easy to do with a layer of plastic under the metal can shell. Early on, flight trajectories minimized the time and intensity of exposure.

All that said, why would any sensible person suppose we would televise the real event and give the Russians or others clues about our technology. It is out of character for our government to risk a catastrophic failure on live TV, so of course NASA filmed a version for public release.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4JOjcDFtBE
 
What is the benefit to making people believe we landed on the moon if we actually didn't.

My life would be no different if never landed on the moon. Who cares if we did or didn't? Why try to trick us?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top