framer
Well-Known Member
Here We go:
https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/242743/NBA-Decreases-17-18-Cap-Space-Projection-From-$107M-To-$102M
So because peeps are signing ridiculous contracts, the BRI discrepancy is shrinking, causing the salary cap growth to slow? If this is actually a thing, I don't expect the contracts to get more frugal, meaning that much of this "unlimited" cap space room will dry up sooner than later. Jazz did well with structuring their contracts.
https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/242743/NBA-Decreases-17-18-Cap-Space-Projection-From-$107M-To-$102M
The NBA's projected salary cap for the 17-18 season has fallen from $107 million to $102 million, according to a report from Eric Pincus.
The cap for the 2017 offseason was expected by some to reach up to $110 million with teams highly anticipating the second substantial increase. The reason for the drop in cap is due to the unexpected rise in salaries.
With the cap increasing to $94 million this offseason, teams had substantially more cap space to work with, but a lower increase will limit their flexibility.
The NBA credits a “substantial increase in projected player spending for 2016-17” that will reduce the league’s projected shortfall to the players to $200 million. The NBA now expects teams to spend more this season, with the higher salary cap and luxury tax threshold ($113.3 million).
So because peeps are signing ridiculous contracts, the BRI discrepancy is shrinking, causing the salary cap growth to slow? If this is actually a thing, I don't expect the contracts to get more frugal, meaning that much of this "unlimited" cap space room will dry up sooner than later. Jazz did well with structuring their contracts.