What's new

Lets say Hayward walks.. How can they best damage control it?

Lets also presume a few more things;

-Rudy gets a 5-year extension signed after the Olympics.

-The Jazz have a successful(injury-free) but unspectacular(In the grand scheme of the NBA) season, and lose in the 1st round.

-George Hill puts up George Hill type of stats.

-Exum shows promise/progress but it's not glaringly obvious that he's ready to lead the squad.

-Hood continues on his upward trajectory (Same for Lyles but it's not much of a consequence to this).

-Snyder proves to be worth every penny they're paying him.




Now Hayward's obviously a key cog, but I'm of the opinion that him walking wouldn't be a crippling blow to all of the momentum the FO has built.. If the right reactionary moves are made.. One might say Joe Johnson on a 2 year deal is a bit of a hedge for if this happens. With Hood, Johnson, Burks 2 first rd picks and of course the cap space left by Hayward it's certainly plausible they could field a playoff worthy backcourt with the obvious playoff worthy frontcourt thats in place.

That cap space must be spent immediately to entice Favors not to walk the next summer.. There's no hitting the breaks now, this is how the game is set for Utah in the next 2 seasons. Thats why this is threadworthy in my mind.

I have a plan, specifically one player they should offer the max, that I kinda think is the best course of action. I wanna hear what y'all think first though.

Who is this [MENTION=2408]PG_AB[/MENTION] an can someone interpret these posts? I do not understand what they say. Sorry.
 
You are predicting a 14 to 17 game improvement from one season to another from a team that was already average. My memory might be failing me but, to tell you the truth, I don't recall anything like that happening over the last ten years, with any team. I hope you're right, though.

I think he is on the crystal meth.
Also think a healthy team adding JJ, Exum, Burks an Hill is easy plus 17 material.
He is on meth you are on bath salt
 
Cunning Linguist is just whats called controlled opposition, and not to be taken seriously under any circumstances, he exists to speak of extreme scenarios to try to broaden the spectrum of responses on this forum, look at him undder that light and you'll see just how predictable and formulaic his responses are. An obvious agent of the mods or owners of this site to fluff up the responses/post counts, and nothing more, he's not the only one too, see Ncoloradojazz and there's several more.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubIpoPjBUds


You're of the thin skinned people. Not a question....
 
Depends on competition for Hayward at the time. I would not rule it out, there could be several suitors.
There really won't be. He is in a contract year and everyone knows he is going to Boston or Utah. No one is going to want to give up that much for a rental.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
 
It's so hot here (we hit 116 a couple days ago).

But I was way more miserable in Kentucky at 95.

Plus the people there are ugly as **** and ****ing backward guns n roses blasting tards.
 
It's just kinda weird that the OP is assuming Gordon Hayward walks, and then the future HOF Chris Paul is gonna come to Utah.

Anyway, I'm with you, I think Paul will team up with another superstar or two in a quest for a ring.

You're full of ****, and putting words in my mouth to fit your condescending narrative.


I say I think something is plausible and you spin it into me assuming something, it's pretty clearly stated what is to be presumed in the OP.
 
You're of the thin skinned people. Not a question....

I just call a spade a spade, while you lames try to suppress the obvious.

the rules here are easily bendable if you pony up the $$, there's certainly droves of you white knight syndrome having fools defending this status quo.
 
Back
Top