What's new

Sources: Utah has expressed interest in re-acquring Deron Williams

@cappy smurf

I guess we have to keep kicking the can down the road to that point where the Millers spend NBA-style money.

Just wait... one year we will pay luxury tax... not this year... not next year but soon. So much luxury tax... Millers likely have to sell all dealerships just to foot the bill. You wait.
 
Or HE will realize that HE is effing good and HE didn't get support from his teammates and that made HIM lose because HE plays a team sport.

HE would also realize that other teams make moves to maximize their chances of success and that if HE wants more success HE should pack HIS bags.

Hayward will stay. The Jazz can give him a bigger contract than anyone. If he does walk we're better off in my opinion. This team lacks an offensive talent that can take over games. I fail to see how we find that guy with Hayward on the max, Gobert making 20 mill+ per and Hill being re-signed. But that's what will happen. Hayward and Hill will stay and we'll likely be stuck in a situation where we can make the playoffs consistently but can't win championships. Then we'll rebuild again.

This was the time to make a big move before we have to pay Hayward and Hill. While we still have cap room. And DL sits on his hands.
 
And other thing we may not know: Deron might want to go to Cleveland over Utah. Do you really want to pick up Deron if he isnt 100% invested in Utah and w/e role we would want for him?
 
It cost us more than "hurt feelings". It cost minutes to players the Jazz want to develop.

Dante has lost minutes to Mack this year... Diaw plays way more than he should and hurts Lyles development.

I think we may have overestimated Dante's progress based on his play in some garbage time games.

Now when winning matters most we decide that getting a starting level player at an important position of need. That could help cover injuries at the two spot... But yeah those development minutes doe.
 
And other thing we may not know: Deron might want to go to Cleveland over Utah. Do you really want to pick up Deron if he isnt 100% invested in Utah and w/e role we would want for him?

He has a no-trade clause... so if he didn't want to come he could state it then...

If he isn't interested in it now I doubt he will be next year.
 
Good riddance. Would have been nice for depth, but honestly, he wouldn't have done much for us. He's always injured and is a shell of his former self. He has looked pretty mediocre in the games I have watched this year.
 
Hayward will stay. The Jazz can give him a bigger contract than anyone. If he does walk we're better off in my opinion. This team lacks an offensive talent that can take over games. I fail to see how we find that guy with Hayward on the max, Gobert making 20 mill+ per and Hill being re-signed. But that's what will happen. Hayward and Hill will stay and we'll likely be stuck in a situation where we can make the playoffs consistently but can't win championships. Then we'll rebuild again.

This was the time to make a big move before we have to pay Hayward and Hill. While we still have cap room. And DL sits on his hands.

I agree on Hayward, but am not sold on Hill. We could offer him like $13M this year and 3 years at 20-25 right now. I imagine we have thrown that offer out, but he wants to be a free agent... why? If you like it here and we can give you near what your max will be then why not take that.
 
Good riddance. Would have been nice for depth, but honestly, he wouldn't have done much for us. He's always injured and is a shell of his former self. He has looked pretty mediocre in the games I have watched this year.

He flashes the crossover once in a blue moon. If I was a Deron fan (I'm team CP3) I'd want him to go to Cleveland to try and win a ring.. It'd just be a reunion tour in Utah..
 
I really wanted D-Will because he is my favorite player of all time. I can understand why the Jazz wouldn't want to add him though. This time is super important to develop Exum as much as possible and the same with Burks, who can still be a huge asset.
 
I agree on Hayward, but am not sold on Hill. We could offer him like $13M this year and 3 years at 20-25 right now. I imagine we have thrown that offer out, but he wants to be a free agent... why? If you like it here and we can give you near what your max will be then why not take that.

Because he could get more money. He has been underpaid his entire career.
 
He has a no-trade clause... so if he didn't want to come he could state it then...

If he isn't interested in it now I doubt he will be next year.

What if he wants to come to Utah in teh future? If he publicly stated "I dont want to go to Utah" that is a terrible and short sighted PR move. Think.

If you forgot, the dude still lives here. Not wise to piss off the fan base if he doesnt have to.
 
Back
Top