What's new
By:

Would you do this?

I

idiot

Well-Known Member
You're KOC on draft night. You've been unable to move up from #6. The first five picks have been chosen. Workouts have convinced you that everyone left on the board is likely to be no more than a solid backup, except for Biyombo, who you're pretty sure will have a Ben Wallace-like career. Orlando's decided it needs third reliable scorer and is offering you Redick and Anderson for Millsap. Do you make the trade and draft Biyombo?

What if Orlando insists on Millsap plus the #12 pick?
 
idiot said:
You're KOC on draft night. You've been unable to move up from #6. The first five picks have been chosen. Workouts have convinced you that everyone left on the board is likely to be no more than a solid backup, except for Biyombo, who you're pretty sure will have a Ben Wallace-like career. Orlando's decided it needs third reliable scorer and is offering you Redick and Anderson for Millsap. Do you make the trade and draft Biyombo?

What if Orlando insists on Millsap plus the #12 pick?
Click to expand...

They better be offering us Richardson, which I would still deny, because he is old as hell.
 
Let me see if I've got this. This move nets the Jazz two good outside shooters. Anderson is a good outside shooter, isn't he? I wonder if they could part with a future pick in addition or instead of Anderson.

To do this the Jazz give up a stud in Millsap, who plays a position he's a little undersized for and one the Jazz are stacked at already, not to mention this year's PF heavy draft (you mentioned Biyombo as a Millsap replacement).

I think this is well thought out. Only thing I wonder about is if this is the maximum they can get for Millsap or if there might be a better deal elsewhere. But I'm not poo-pooing it at all. If this deal were on the table I think it would definitely be one worth considering.
 
BENTLEY said:
Let me see if I've got this. This move nets the Jazz two good outside shooters. Anderson is a good outside shooter, isn't he? I wonder if they could part with a future pick in addition or instead of Anderson.

To do this the Jazz give up a stud in Millsap, who plays a position he's a little undersized for and one the Jazz are stacked at already, not to mention this year's PF heavy draft (you mentioned Biyombo as a Millsap replacement).

I think this is well thought out. Only thing I wonder about is if this is the maximum they can get for Millsap or if there might be a better deal elsewhere. But I'm not poo-pooing it at all. If this deal were on the table I think it would definitely be one worth considering.
Click to expand...

If Millsap's trend of vast off-season improvement continues, it would not surprise me if he became a better outside shooter than Anderson, or at least a more efficient one.
 
No reason to trade Millsap or get pushed into anything in the draft. Millsap a great sixth man and can play 30 mins. based on the match-up. Biyombo would just be a rookie and would take as much time from Fess as he would from Millsap.

Besides, Jan Vesely, Jonas Valanciunas and Terrence Jones are legit picks even at six. The Jazz should pick the best player they can regardless of position.

Oh, and rumors are already starting that the Magic will try to proactively trade Dwight Howard before he becomes a FA.
 
Dwill_PwnasaurasRex said:
If Millsap's trend of vast off-season improvement continues, it would not surprise me if he became a better outside shooter than Anderson, or at least a more efficient one.
Click to expand...

Yeah, Millsap > Anderson certainly. It's just a matter of dealing with the drop-off from Sap to Anderson in order to get you Redick. But getting Redick means Hayward moves back to the 3. And I really like him at the 2. I'd rather just draft Barnes.

I think this discussions over. At least until we find out the results of the lottery.
 
Redick's good - he can hit from outside, which the Jazz would benefit from. But he's not nearly equal to Millsap. Orlando would have to give more. Anderson is NOT more - he'd be replacing Millsap at a position that the Jazz are already too crowded at anyway. The Jazz don't need to replace Millsap, they need to move his production to another position. If Millsap could be just as good at the 3 as he is at the 4 then the move wouldn't be needed. The jury's out still if Millsap can be a positive for the Jazz while manning the sf position.

At any rate, this would not be an equal trade unless Orlando gave up something of value to Utah, in addition to Redick.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top