Once AK is gone, I suspect the Jazz to remain more in the middle of the pack.
With new CBA every team may be very close to each other. Small market teams will be pushing very hard for this and perhaps the franchise tag.
Once AK is gone, I suspect the Jazz to remain more in the middle of the pack.
https://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=6354899
Wow, props to the Millers for shelling out money. Obviously AK's $17 million contract had a lot to do with this, but instead of sulking and giving up until AK's contract of doom was done, they still brought in guys and remained competitive.
What this list really tells me, is that I should get my son into soccer. Obviously, that's where the money is at...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but every year for the past 4 years there were times when Jazz Fans thought there team could win the championship. Every year the Jazz management has brought in enough talent to hopefully win it all.
This year when we were the comeback kids (more specifically after we beat the Lakers) everyone was thinking "Oh man, just think how good this team could be when they actually play 4 quarters of basketball instead of 3" (little did we know they'd only play 2!)
Last February we were incredible. After the Sundiata Gaines 3 pointer the Jazz put on a 10 game win streak and no one played as well as them. Unfortunately we had some injuries.
The year before we had a top 5-10 with an All-star sitting on the bench most of the year. I believe when Booze was back and Millsap coming off the bench we'd do okay...
The Jazz have been competitive.
Make a playoff run? Yes
Championship? Not since the Malone and Stockton mid/late 90s did I ever think they had a legit shot.
For starters, I'd say you have to win more games than you lose. I don't think finishing out the season with a 12-30 record qualifies as being "competitive"...but that's just me.so tell me akirac73, what is your definition of competitive?