What's new

Game 3 Thread: 6:30 PM MT Time

No thanks. Make things clearer. I keep reiterating my point. You can too.

A dude called the playoffs anti-climatic.

I said you can't call something anti-climatic until you've seen the ending and that the Warriors/Cavs matchup is set-up to be very exciting.

I said if the NBA season were a story, the beginning of the playoffs would be the middle. You can call that part crappy, it doesnt mean it's anti-climatic.

It's not hard to read.
 
A dude called the playoffs anti-climatic.

I said you can't call something anti-climatic until you've seen the ending and that the Warriors/Cavs matchup is set-up to be very exciting.

I said if the NBA season were a story, the beginning of the playoffs would be the middle. You can call that part crappy, it doesnt mean it's anti-climatic.

It's not hard to read.
Ok. Then you MIGHT be right. The finals MIGHT be a great climax. The playoffs as a whole, in general suck doe.

I don't like that personally.
 
I still didn't understand the Jazz medical staff strategy during the season.

I thought they took cautious approach with the injured players resting them longer than expected to make sure they will be at 100% during playoff times. I was wrong.

Burks played almost the entire season then they suddenly shut him down during the playoffs.
 
Cool. I never argued with you about that at all. I dont care if you like it/dont like it, but it's set up to have a very exciting end. Someone calling it anti-climatic sounds silly and bitter just because their favorite team isnt going to do well. The reality is 90% of casual NBA fans dont care and just want to see the heavyweight fight at the end.
 
Lol. That is rich coming from you. How often do you acknowledge someone else's side of a discussion?

Always, that whole discussion was me taking what someone said and analyzing it and making a point. You didnt read anything I said and interjected yourself into it and just made it about your opinion on the playoffs as a whole rather than what we were discussing (what anti-climatic means in the context of the playoffs).
 
This team is just not good enough to be anything close to a contender. Two consistently productive players won't get you to the finals.
 
Cool. I never argued with you about that at all. I dont care if you like it/dont like it, but it's set up to have a very exciting end. Someone calling it anti-climatic sounds silly and bitter just because their favorite team isnt going to do well. The reality is 90% of casual NBA fans dont care and just want to see the heavyweight fight at the end.
Tbh honest he said "can anybody ever remember a less anti-climatic playoffs"
Which, when you break it down means that he thinks it's very climactic due to his use of a double negative lol.

I think he meant more anti climactic lol
Can anybody else remember a less anti-climatic playoffs? I mean I think the Spurs will take a game or two from the Warriors, but obviously we're going to have a 3rd finals rematch, which I will watch none of.


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using JazzFanz mobile app
 
And even though I want the Jazz to win it all and kick Cleveland's ***, I would be lying if I said I wasn't very excited to see GSW vs Cavs in the finals.
 
Always, that whole discussion was me taking what someone said and analyzing it and making a point. You didnt read anything I said and interjected yourself into it and just made it about your opinion on the playoffs as a whole rather than what we were discussing (what anti-climatic means in the context of the playoffs).
I read between the lines of what he was saying which is that the playoffs suck. There is no mystery of what will happen. No anticipation of who we might see in the finals. Etc.

I feel the same way.
 
[MENTION=253]Saint Cy of JFC[/MENTION]

Let's smoke some herb bro

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Back
Top