What's new
By:

Following potential 2017 draftees...

Saint Cy of JFC said:
"unclean correlation" is not a term...
Click to expand...

Do you know what the Vitruvian Man is ? If you demonstrate to us your correlation in it's most simple form it will not hold up on a case-by-case basis... It's not a ****ing matter of semantics...

It's a matter of you don't know what your talking about (once again) and couldn't find proof of it if you searched the globe 5x over.

You're reaching. It's not a direct correlation.

What is the correlation in it's most simplest form?? Let us know because I'm gonna bury you with examples once you MAN UP and post it.. I will cite no less than 100 examples of why you are wrong just as a demonstration.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Hate to agree with Ncolorado, but having a freakish 40''+ vertical doesnt mean a lot. Very few players who actually measure out with those ever put it to use in a competitive game setting. Zach Lavine is really only one of the few absolute vertical freaks who does.
Click to expand...

No one really needs to jump 40+ inches in an actual game setting. The vertical does affirm a certain degree of athleticism and explosiveness. That's all it's really for.
 
PG_AB said:
Do you know what the Vitruvian Man is ? If you demonstrate to us your correlation in it's most simple form it will not hold up on a case-by-case basis... It's not a ****ing matter of semantics...

It's a matter of you don't know what your talking about and couldn't find proof of it if you searched the globe 5x over.

You're reaching. It's not a direct correlation.

What is the correlation in it's most simplest form?? Let us know because I'm gonna bury you with examples once you MAN UP and post it.. I will cite no less than 100 examples of why you are wrong just as a demonstration.
Click to expand...

This is hilarious.

Height and standing reach are correlated. Any dumb monkey could tell you that. If you really want to argue it, go ahead. Keep making up terms like "unclean correlation". It's hilarious to watch you expose yourself.
 
Catchall said:
No one really needs to jump 40+ inches in an actual game setting. The vertical does affirm a certain degree of athleticism and explosiveness. That's all it's really for.
Click to expand...

True true. Hopefully he can enter the dunk contest. Derrick Jones Jr is going to need a competitor.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
This is hilarious.

Height and standing reach are correlated. Any dumb monkey could tell you that. If you really want to argue it, go ahead. Keep making up terms like "unclean correlation". It's hilarious to watch you expose yourself.
Click to expand...

Wheres the fraction? There's no direct correlation. You just keep repeating yourself. You're literally here now trying to spread lies to make yourself look better. A perfect microcosm of many of our past arguments.
 
Expose myself? this ******* is claiming a correlation but can't demonstrate what the correlation is in it's simplest form. What more do you need to know??

don't quit your day job [MENTION=253]Saint Cy of JFC[/MENTION]

[MENTION=2500]BTP[/MENTION] This guy is a great example of why people from other countries say Americans are dumb and proud. Right?
 
PG_AB said:
Wheres the fraction? There's no direct correlation. You just keep repeating yourself. You're literally here now trying to spread lies to make yourself look better. A perfect microcosm of many of our past arguments.
Click to expand...

Why are you trying to make this an argument? I stated there is a correlation (there is and it's obvious to anyone with a brain, which I guess you might not have). I never made a statement as to how strong the correlation is. I'm not going to run the math on it. You are welcome to do so. Have fun.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Why are you trying to make this an argument? I stated there is a correlation (there is and it's obvious to anyone with a brain, which I guess you might not have). I never made a statement as to how strong the correlation is. I'm not going to run the math on it. You are welcome to do so. Have fun.
Click to expand...

And I stated you can't demonstrate what the correlation is. And you can't. You keep spinning your tires talking about people with brains. People with brains can see that you're wrong and full of ****(as usual), and don't wanna lose even though you're fighting a losing argument.

Again, WHAT IS THE CORRELATION? Whats the fraction, Mr. Vitruvian Man??
 
PG_AB said:
Expose myself? this ******* is claiming a correlation but can't demonstrate what the correlation is in it's simplest form. What more do you need to know??

don't quit your day job [MENTION=253]Saint Cy of JFC[/MENTION]

[MENTION=2500]BTP[/MENTION] This guy is a great example of why people from other countries say Americans are dumb and proud. Right?
Click to expand...

you are both being ugly americans
 
PG_AB said:
And I stated you can't demonstrate what the correlation is. And you can't. You keep spinning your tires talking about people with brains. People with brains can see that you're wrong and full of ****(as usual), and don't wanna lose even though you're fighting a losing argument.

Again, WHAT IS THE CORRELATION? Whats the fraction, Mr. Vitruvian Man??
Click to expand...

lmao

You start using terms like "clean vs unclean correlation". Then you state "case by case basis" like individual cases change the fact that correlation is based on a large set of data. Individual cases dont have to "hold up" for a correlation to be present. Just go back to scouting high schoolers. This is amateur hour.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top