I mean, if I knew he was leaving, yeah it's good. I thought he was staying tho.
So did I. My argument was that since there was a chance he's leaving, it's a good move. Hypothetically, if there's a 30% chance Hayward leaves, then we're trading the pick for 70% of Hayward. There was also a point of disagreement about whether Ball or Fultz was the better prospect.
But that's neither here nor there. The question is, would Boston have traded the pick for Hayward last offseason?