What's new
By:

Central tank command : the official thread

Darkwing Duck said:
Hood is the Jazz' second best player. He's receiving 3% of team salary
Mitchell is the Jazz' third best player. He's receiving 3% of team salary.
Click to expand...

Ah, forgot Hood is on the lower end of the rookie scale. Good call.

Still, Hood isn't our 2nd best player. Favors is by far and clearly the 2nd best. It's too bad him and Gobert don't work well together. This G injury might be a blessing in disguise as Favors is increasing his trade value dramatically right now.

And lol that Mitchell is the 2nd or 3rd best player. Thabo and Ingles occupy the spots behind Favors, and then 6th man Rodney gets a nod. Mitchell might become not Trey Burke some day but for now he's about at Alec Burks' level as far as ranking best player goes.
 
franklin said:
Ah, forgot Hood is on the lower end of the rookie scale. Good call.

Still, Hood isn't our 2nd best player. Favors is by far and clearly the 2nd best. It's too bad him and Gobert don't work well together. This G injury might be a blessing in disguise as Favors is increasing his trade value dramatically right now.

And lol that Mitchell is the 2nd or 3rd best player. Thabo and Ingles occupy the spots behind Favors, and then 6th man Rodney gets a nod. Mitchell might become not Trey Burke some day but for now he's about at Alec Burks' level as far as ranking best player goes.
Click to expand...

You are selling Mitchell way, way, way short. His first NBA week was abysmal.

During November:

18.1 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 3.6 apg, 1.5 spg on %s of 41.3 FG, 37.5 3s and 81 FTs.

Clearly there is room for improvement but you are doing him way wrong by comparing him to Burke. He is already a better player that Burke has ever been. IQ, instinct, speed, athleticism, vision, physicality, coach-ability, leadership, strength and attitude are all undeniably better than Burke. They're not even comparable. You are regularly insightful and provide a great take that is outside the group think. You are just wrong here though.

Jazz need to proceed with the idea that Mitchell is the 2nd best player on the Jazz. If he isn't yet he will be soon. Right now I'd have him 3rd behind Gobert and Hood.
 
Yeah, I'd probably give 2nd best player to Ingles.

I think Mitchell is our 2nd most important simply because he provides things the Jazz lack, but guys like Favors or Ingles are better.

There is just this huge rush to anoint Mitchell because of the Hayward feels.

Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Stoked said:
You are selling Mitchell way, way, way short. His first NBA week was abysmal.

During November:

18.1 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 3.6 apg, 1.5 spg on %s of 41.3 FG, 37.5 3s and 81 FTs.

Clearly there is room for improvement but you are doing him way wrong by comparing him to Burke. He is already a better player that Burke has ever been. IQ, instinct, speed, athleticism, vision, physicality, coach-ability, leadership, strength and attitude are all undeniably better than Burke. They're not even comparable. You are regularly insightful and provide a great take that is outside the group think. You are just wrong here though.

Jazz need to proceed with the idea that Mitchell is the 2nd best player on the Jazz. If he isn't yet he will be soon. Right now I'd have him 3rd behind Gobert and Hood.
Click to expand...
You forgot defense, rebounds and likability in ways that Mitchell is already better than Burke ever was.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top