What's new

Impact of Market Underestimation of Future Salary Cap

checkbookdoc

Well-Known Member
Hey everyone, this is a long post so here is a quick summary: In this post I contend that the NBA market is significantly underestimating the salary cap number which should be used in decision making, I discuss what I believe the consequences of this will be, and then I discuss general actions that the front office should take in response to this belief. In the end, I ask if you agree, and what specific moves you would make if this is correct.


Over the last few months I have come to believe that the consensus expectation of future salary cap levels is significantly underestimated. I believe this underestimate is driven by 1) the current collective bargaining agreement incentivizing the league office and owners to use conservative estimates (this results in, for example, projecting the unusually low number of playoff games of the last few years into future estimates), and 2) the current estimate not taking into consideration revenue from new sources (e.g., jersey advertisements & sports gambling). In December 2016, the salary cap estimate by the Player’s Association for the ‘20-’21 season was $120 Million, which is about 20% higher than this year’s $101 million. Again, this projection does not include the new sources of revenue. In short, I believe the salary cap will climb significantly over the next few years.


If the salary cap does increase by more than was expected by the NBA market, 1) long-term contracts at market price now will be significant assets in the future, similarly, long-term contracts that are overpaid now will be at market price in the future, and 2) the use of cap space to sign long term contracts will be more valuable this summer than future summers (both because there will be a greater market inefficiency this year, and also because there will be more teams with cap space than projected in future years), and 3) the ability to generate cap space for another team will be more valuable in the future (as teams recognize there will be significant increases to the salary cap).


If this is correct, then I believe the front office should be aggressive in, 1) acquiring players with long-term contracts through both free agency and the trade market, 2) creating cap space this year, rather than waiting for 2019, 3) acquiring contracts which will facilitate cap creation for other teams, and 4) taking on “bad” contracts in exchange for future draft picks since the rookie contracts will be an even greater value (at least through 2020-2021).


So I am interested in knowing: 1) do you think this is correct and 2) does it change your opinion on any transactions this summer?
 
Cap is projected at 120m in 2020? Wow. That seems way too high. 20% growth in just 2 years. It'll be adjusted down. I don't think the Jazz should gamble their future on such speculation.
 
Cap is projected at 120m in 2020? Wow. That seems way too high. 20% growth in just 2 years. It'll be adjusted down. I don't think the Jazz should gamble their future on such speculation.
i think there's a decent chance of a big spike in light of the whole gambling thing going ahead ??
 
They are going to lose some revenue when the tv rights are re-negotiated... they paid too much last time around and there are too many cord cutters.

There will be a net increase when gambling revenue kicks in.
 
Cap is projected at 120m in 2020? Wow. That seems way too high. 20% growth in just 2 years. It'll be adjusted down. I don't think the Jazz should gamble their future on such speculation.
Thank you, this is exactly my point! There is a very high chance that teams are underestimating how the salary cap will grow over the next few years. There are good reasons to assume that the cap has a growth rate of 8-12 percent over the next 3 years. If this is the case, would it impact your preference on transactions this summer?

For me it would matter. It makes me more interested in trading for Aaron Gordon. I would also be more likely to consider a trade for Andrew Wiggins (for me still a hard pass), or taking on long term salary for a good draft pick.
 
Mark Cuban believes gambling will have a huge impact on NBA team revenues: https://www.cbssports.com/general/n...wner-just-saw-the-value-of-their-team-double/

I think that's true more in a way that some people who value the future earning potential of an NBA franchise because of gambling very highly may be willing to overpay, but there won't be any immediate earnings, as the NBA has stated they prefer a national ruling on this matter and then they'll see if they partner up with someone big scale or address it in those states that allow it.

Thank you, this is exactly my point! There is a very high chance that teams are underestimating how the salary cap will grow over the next few years. There are good reasons to assume that the cap has a growth rate of 8-12 percent over the next 3 years. If this is the case, would it impact your preference on transactions this summer?

For me it would matter. It makes me more interested in trading for Aaron Gordon. I would also be more likely to consider a trade for Andrew Wiggins (for me still a hard pass), or taking on long term salary for a good draft pick.

I do not think there will be big jumps in the salary cap because the previous model overestimated competitiveness and maybe didn't calculate people putting less money into the regular season because of those issues.

I'd love throwing Aaron Gordon a big offer sheet and see what Orlando does about it. Could be a worthwhile risk, he looks like someone who has the potential to fit next to Rudy. Even though it's a big gamble because if he doesn't keep his shooting improvements up he won't be worth it (and his free throw situation is still dire)
 
Back
Top