What's new

Biyombo at #3... Why not?!

Would you draft Biyombo at #3?

  • Yes

    Votes: 7 14.6%
  • No

    Votes: 40 83.3%
  • Yes, and i'd take Singleton at #12 if he was there!

    Votes: 1 2.1%

  • Total voters
    48
this is my fav Biyombo picture

5y93r9.jpg


look at that guy below him, kind of looks like Kanter
 
this is my fav Biyombo picture

5y93r9.jpg


look at that guy below him, kind of looks like Kanter


He definitely has some gangly arms. He is a major reach at 3 consider he has next to no offensive game. If we moved down I wouldn't have a problem with considering him if Knight was off the board.
 
Cool, but why mention Kanter .. unless it's, ya know, Kanter.

My best guess, he doesn't like Kanter and doesn't want us to draft him. So much Kanter hate. It has now overtaken the hate Knight was getting. Why can't we all just take a chill pill and be supportive of the player we end up drafting even if it is someone like Vesely.
 
My best guess, he doesn't like Kanter and doesn't want us to draft him. So much Kanter hate. It has now overtaken the hate Knight was getting. Why can't we all just take a chill pill and be supportive of the player we end up drafting even if it is someone like Vesely.

+1 I'm defintely game .. just want to get it right .. the Hayward pick taught me a lesson.
 
Biyombo is only listed as 6'9". Small forward material; way too small for a C. Even at PF he's only SLIGHTLY taller than Paul Millsap, but lighter... Don't see him as a #3 pick.
 
Biyombo is only listed as 6'9". Small forward material; way too small for a C. Even at PF he's only SLIGHTLY taller than Paul Millsap, but lighter... Don't see him as a #3 pick.

His standing reach is 9' 3".
Dwight Howard's is 9' 3.5".


Also he weighs the same as Howard did coming into the league.
 
3 is a reach for sure, but if KOC wants to go for it, there'd be no pitchfork in my hand. My only real concern would be if Favors can get himself to the 20-22 ppg game range. We need one of them to be able to score...
 
Back
Top