What's new

Supreme Court Justice Kennedy to Retire

Status
Not open for further replies.
We should totally impeach Bill Clinton... Ready, set, GO!

****! Turns out he hasn't been the president for almost two decades. Guess that's why "no one cares."


Lots of evidence of Hillary demeaning and trying to destroy her husbands accusers, including greenlighting the investigator hires to ruin Flowers reputation. Hillary being complicit is awful, and we almost put Bill back in the WH last yr. Think his behavior towards women has changed? There is evidence of Bill being on orgy island, where underage girls were raped.

We should care that we allow our representatives to pull this ****. It happens on both sides and people try to justify why their parties actions are acceptable, when none of them are.

When I see the smug reactions from many posters, bring complicit with their parties actions and attacking the others for doing the same type of actions, it makes it clear to me that we have the politicians we deserve.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Broaddarick



Lots of evidence of Hillary demeaning and trying to destroy her husbands accusers, including greenlighting the investigator hires to ruin Flowers reputation. Hillary being complicit is awful, and we almost put Bill back in the WH last yr. Think his behavior towards women has changed? There is evidence of Bill being on orgy island, where underage girls were raped.

We should care that we allow our representatives to pull this ****. It happens on both sides and people try to justify why their parties actions are acceptable, when none of them are.

When I see the smug reactions from many posters, bring complicit with their parties actions and attacking the others for doing the same type of actions, it makes it clear to me that we have the politicians we deserve.
My party?

I'm not a politician. I don't have a party.

I'll say for the 100th ****ing time on jazzfanz, I have voted for more Republican Presidential candidates than I have Democrat.

I'm certainly rooting for the Democrats at the moment because I want Trump to be held to the standards of conduct that every other President has been held to. He is normalizing behavior that is 100% unacceptable to me.

I supported Bill Clinton being impeached because he looked directly at the American people and lied, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." That, in and of itself, made me feel strongly that he was not worthy of being my President.

Hillary Clinton is NOT the President. You're going to need to find a new boogeyman. You have slain that one, congratulations. You can't beat her anymore, she's already dead. She will never hold another elected position or be appointed to a high level position. She's done. Time to move the **** on.

The question isn't how you want previous officials to act. The question is, how do you want our current officials to act?
 
If K lacks the moral character to come clean about his alleged crimes what else is the guy hiding? I for one am still curious how all his debt was paid off. What about his conflicts of interest?

What else is he lying about?

why shouldn't morality count when we're talking about a justice? If his judgement sucks so bad why the hell are we considering him for the Supreme Court? Is it because he favors big corporations (who paid off his debt) and a president who wants him to shield him from investigation, and a Christian right salivating over the prospect of rolling back one of the key civil rights achievements of the past century?

These things matter.

Morality does count. Don't think I'm advocating to outright ignore everything else I mentioned last night, and his debts that added up so quickly(thank you for reminding me), and one that I forgot(native rights prejudice/neglect brought up by Senator Hirono). What I was saying, was that the way this allegation was handled by he and his legal coaching staff alone is enough to exclude him on both Temperament and Character.

Please don't fool yourself into thinking we should constantly be asking 'what else is s/he lying about?'. It's simply unrealistic to think we're going to find nine saint level figures, having fair representation from all religious groups(including non-religious), with spotless records beyond reproach, that also happen to have law degrees and extensive experience interpreting the constitution.
 
My party?

I'm not a politician. I don't have a party.

I'll say for the 100th ****ing time on jazzfanz, I have voted for more Republican Presidential candidates than I have Democrat.

I'm certainly rooting for the Democrats at the moment because I want Trump to be held to the standards of conduct that every other President has been held to. He is normalizing behavior that is 100% unacceptable to me.

I supported Bill Clinton being impeached because he looked directly at the American people and lied, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." That, in and of itself, made me feel strongly that he was not worthy of being my President.

Hillary Clinton is NOT the President. You're going to need to find a new boogeyman. You have slain that one, congratulations. You can't beat her anymore, she's already dead. She will never hold another elected position or be appointed to a high level position. She's done. Time to move the **** on.

The question isn't how you want previous officials to act. The question is, how do you want our current officials to act?

The question is how we keep letting these types of people get elected. Hillary or Trump. Some choice.

And yes, Clinton was impeached by the House, but not one democrat in the senate voted for conviction, even though he clearly lied under oath. Goes to show how our two main parties simply vote the party line, not what is best for the country, or what the evidence dictates. Same **** continues today. And instead of fixing these issues, both parties just point the finger at each other instead of looking in the mirror.

IMO, as long as we have a two party system that essentially selects candidate options for us, it will continue to be this way.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@JAZZGASM pointing out their hypocrisy with Juanita Broaddrick - they aren't upset about that in the least and mock it. I'm very surprised the admin of this site lets this propaganda take place here.
 
@JAZZGASM pointing out their hypocrisy with Juanita Broaddrick - they aren't upset about that in the least and mock it. I'm very surprised the admin of this site lets this propaganda take place here.
Hey, dumbass, I was a ****ing kid when that **** happened. I'm in my 40s now. We didn't have the google and facebook back then. If we wanted to listen to music and we were up on the new tech we played a CD, but many of us were still using cassette tapes.

I didn't hear a lot about her back then, to be honest, and I was a pretty avid watcher of news, especially for a teenager.

You are trying to EXCUSE someone in a current situation by pointing out a situation involving a retired President. I'm sorry that we don't think Bill Clinton is relevant to Kavanaugh's confirmation. But it's not. We didn't have to be up in arms in the early 90s in order to have a negative view of possible sexual assault now. The idea that we're being hypocrites is some silly ****.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top