What's new

Culturally Insensitive man bets a million dollars...

Yeah, man. I read about it afterwards. I thought the official one was never released and the one they did release was fabricated.

2 official certificates were released, neither fabricated. Is there any conservative site so unreliable you won't swallow what it says whole?
 
I believe 14 years, as opposed to most of their lives, and as a third condition, be a minimum of 35 years old.

So based on this his location of birth is irrelevant. He could have been born in Mongolia for all it matters. His mom is American. Case closed.
 
I know it has to do with being born here, but am not aware how live here for most their lives.

This says “natural born citizen”.

https://www.loc.gov/teachers/classr...ons/elections/requirements-for-president.html

Natural born citizen has been interpreted to mean born in the US or a citizen from the moment of birth.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause

So basically, as far as I can tell, this only matter if one feels it MUST be born in US and not citizen at birth.
 
2 official certificates were released, neither fabricated. Is there any conservative site so unreliable you won't swallow what it says whole?
Back in 2011 I was about as into politics as Elizabeth Warren is Native American.

Do you always try and be a pompous *******?

You continue to show that you get off on being wrong and you make piss poor assumptions.
 
This says “natural born citizen”.

https://www.loc.gov/teachers/classr...ons/elections/requirements-for-president.html

Natural born citizen has been interpreted to mean born in the US or a citizen from the moment of birth.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause

So basically, as far as I can tell, this only matter if one feels it MUST be born in US and not citizen at birth.

That's what I figured, but didn't know if there were more to it. Thanks for sharing.
 
For what it is worth, a lot of politicians on both sides raised the birther issue when George Romney ran for President. He was clearly a U.S. Citizen, but it didn't stop people from trying to use that against him. 'merica.
 
Are we not all entitled to our own heritage?

not if it's 1/500th lol Common sense really

The earliest I can be certain anybody in my branches arrived on these shores was 1852. If I could be certain I had any Native American ancestry, even as little as 1/1024, I'd be very proud of that fact. The reason for that is I'd love knowing I had at least some ancestry with the deepest roots possible in North America. At present, we can be fairly certain humans arrived in North America by 18,000-20,000 years ago. There are sites dated older then that, but that's a conservative estimate that is generally accepted. Arrival in this hemisphere might have been earlier. Now, that's just how I would feel. I have always loved the study of American prehistory, and so it would be very cool to me to know I had even a tiny percentage of ancestry with exceedingly deep roots here. I'd also like being able to say I had ancestors here in colonial times, but I can't. Simply because I love American history, as well as its prehistory. What events in our history that my ancestors did partake in, I am proud of. I'll take what I can get.

Now, I would not identify as Native American, with such a tiny percentage, but I think it would be great just the same, I'd be delighted.
 
Back
Top