RandyForRubio
Well-Known Member
Several things here.
1st, it should not be the President's decision. This is essentially a treaty with other countries. It is up to the Senate and Congress to decide. They are not there just for advice, it is their decision. This started with the Obama administration, is continuing with the Trump administration, and both of them are wrong for it.
Second, there is some real debate as to whether this actually is a good idea. With it, we're looking at maybe a 0.17 C change in degrees over the next 70 years. That's globally. So what would we get from that? Well, an estimate a 15-20% increase in household electrical expenditures over the next decade. A loss of about 400,000 jobs. Total income loss of about $30,000 for a family of 4. Aggregate GDP loss of $2.5 Trillion. That's not exactly great.
1st, it should not be the President's decision. This is essentially a treaty with other countries. It is up to the Senate and Congress to decide. They are not there just for advice, it is their decision. This started with the Obama administration, is continuing with the Trump administration, and both of them are wrong for it.
Second, there is some real debate as to whether this actually is a good idea. With it, we're looking at maybe a 0.17 C change in degrees over the next 70 years. That's globally. So what would we get from that? Well, an estimate a 15-20% increase in household electrical expenditures over the next decade. A loss of about 400,000 jobs. Total income loss of about $30,000 for a family of 4. Aggregate GDP loss of $2.5 Trillion. That's not exactly great.
