jimmy eat jazz
Well-Known Member
I don't know if anyone's posted this yet, but take a look at this link:
https://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/30332/get-to-the-point-knight-vs-walker
I'm not one to over-emphasize a single statistic (I think they're most useful when considered with other stats and other 'soft' considerations), but this really jumps out at me. According to this measure of PG productivity, Knight is not only bad, he's really, really bad. This gives me some pause, and I find myself leaning a bit more toward Kanter now (although I go back and forth on the two like a yo-yo--I've conceded that the Jazz will take one of these two at #3).
I don't have the context to understand just how useful this particular stat is, but in any event, it is troubling. I want to hit a homerun at #3. Geez, is there any 'safe' (low risk, high reward) pick in this draft?
https://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/30332/get-to-the-point-knight-vs-walker
I'm not one to over-emphasize a single statistic (I think they're most useful when considered with other stats and other 'soft' considerations), but this really jumps out at me. According to this measure of PG productivity, Knight is not only bad, he's really, really bad. This gives me some pause, and I find myself leaning a bit more toward Kanter now (although I go back and forth on the two like a yo-yo--I've conceded that the Jazz will take one of these two at #3).
I don't have the context to understand just how useful this particular stat is, but in any event, it is troubling. I want to hit a homerun at #3. Geez, is there any 'safe' (low risk, high reward) pick in this draft?