What's new
By:

Burks at #12

the last word on the quality of this pick will come when we can see what kind of defender Burks can be. If he can be one of those long 2s who can stay in front of many 1s, then we got a total steal.
 
GVC said:
But if CJ starts, LOOK OUT NBA!

The Jazz are going to need more than one shooter on the court, and Paul is a better shooter than CJ. He creates a great mismatch in the post, the short corner, etc. against 3s on the offensive end. Further, CJ's nothing special defensively, and Paul should be able to man up opposing 3s as well as CJ has.

Paul Millsap was the Jazz's most efficient, well rounded and consistent player this past season. He's shown he can make major strides over an offseason (as he did with his J last year). He should be starting, and Kanter and Favors should also be getting minutes. The best way for the Jazz to win games is for Sap to get significant minutes at the 3.
Click to expand...

No, as I mentioned, the Jazz still need to acquire a starting SF, preferably a veteran. Millsap can play some backup mins. at the 3. He can start at the 4 until Favors is ready. And Kanter likely gets 10-15 initially. there's enough playing time to go around right now, unless Okur comes back strong and healthy.
 
Hanginthere said:
Yeah, I really don't like this pick... Smells like another Ronnie Brewer with less consistency shooting from the perimeter... Sure maybe Hornacek can coach him up but I liked our #3 pick better.

Would have loved Jimmer... Now he can shoot...
Click to expand...

Sure he can, problem is getting open in the NBA. Remember how many clean looks Korver got a game? 1 or 2 at most. And that's when we had the best PG in the league....
 
Hanginthere said:
Yeah, I really don't like this pick... Smells like another Ronnie Brewer with less consistency shooting from the perimeter... Sure maybe Hornacek can coach him up but I liked our #3 pick better.

Would have loved Jimmer... Now he can shoot...
Click to expand...

Burks is not a less consistent shooter then Brewer. Their similarity starts and ends with athletic ability. It is an absurd comparison.
 
carolinajazz said:
.....never heard of this kid...but why be overly concerned about his 3 point shooting? The Jazz don't like to shoot many 3's to begin with. We want HIGH percentage shots! Yes, 3 pointers are nice and we'll get our share. But in the paint domination and 2 point shots are the better formula for winning basketball, especially in the playoffs!
Click to expand...

we need to keep the defense honest from 3 to unclog the paint, so we can dominate it, and play winning bball.
 
His game looks a lot like a younger Corey Maggette to me. Good handles can drive and get to the line. I believe they are the same height but Corey plays forward. It appears that he is a little further advances at this point than Maggette was as a rookie, and may have a little better outside shot, but a tad less athleticism. If he can add a three pointer to his game, he could easily be better than Maggette. He will not be a Dwayne Wade, but I can live with a younger Maggette.

That's good value at the 12 pick.
 
I think Brandon Roy is the best comparison so far. Just wait. Instead of chucking 3's like CJ, he'll drive to the hole creating all kinds of contact. Alec Burks will live at the line.
 
carolinajazz said:
.....never heard of this kid...but why be overly concerned about his 3 point shooting? The Jazz don't like to shoot many 3's to begin with. We want HIGH percentage shots! Yes, 3 pointers are nice and we'll get our share. But in the paint domination and 2 point shots are the better formula for winning basketball, especially in the playoffs!
Click to expand...
Dallas and Miami demonstrated this... errr, wait a second.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top