Donald Fires FBI Director who's investigating Russian Election Hacking

[Ron Mexico]

I get how "News" papers supposedly work. You are choosing to dance around the issue. The New York Times isn't publishing positive articles on Capitalism. They are though with socialism. Who cares if it says opinion next to the article. Its still propaganda.

The same google search just replaced socialism with capitalism.

View attachment 6801 View attachment 6802 View attachment 6803

Clearly you dont. Stating an opinion and expressing as such is not propaganda. I am not going to try and read through your links and research after you just totally whiffed on some many things. I cant take you serious on this. Sorry, best of luck with other false things you are stating.

 

[Ron Mexico]

Its funny that no matter how many times I say it people still try to use that against me.

I KNOW Fox news is biased in the same way every leftist news outlet is biased.

I literally have never defended Fox or Breitbart.

Clearly you dont know because they are different from each other. Biased isnt the same as what they are doing. Im done with you for the night though. You have embarrassed yourself with bad info enough for my entertainment.

 

[Hotdog]

Clearly you dont know because they are different from each other. Biased isnt the same as what they are doing. Im done with you for the night though. You have embarrassed yourself with bad info enough for my entertainment.

Right Bro.

The New York Times is dripping with pro socialism and anti capitalism articles and that's not socialism propaganda coming from a "newspaper"

What next? The earth is flat? The moon is fake? What other solid facts you got in your bag?

 

[Hotdog]

Clearly you dont know because they are different from each other. Biased isnt the same as what they are doing. Im done with you for the night though. You have embarrassed yourself with bad info enough for my entertainment.

Here, let me help you since you want to avoid using the actual definition of propaganda.

 

[Hotdog]

Weird, I dont see anywhere in the definition it saying its not propaganda if you just say its an opinion article.

 

[fishonjazz]

Depends what you believe. If you think socialism is bad, then yes they are. They clearly push it along with all sorts of bad ideas like race baiting divisive nonsense.

How do you explain the screen shots showing all the socialism pushing stories from the New York Times? A quick google search links you to countless socialism propaganda. They push the stories out constantly. Thats brain washing propaganda.

Raise your hand if you know what propaganda is. Seriously, anyone here?

You should move to another country that doesnt have so many people on the left and so much leftist propaganda.


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[Stoked]

Weird, I dont see anywhere in the definition it saying its not propaganda if you just say its an opinion article.

So all opinion is propoganda. So lead with example and stop your propaganda.

 

[Red]

The New York Times and the leftist media is the enemy of the American people. The socialist propaganda is a problem.

Why do leftists try so hard to change this country anyways? Why not just move to any other place in the world where their idea of a utopia is already setup? Just move,...and enjoy

Every authoritarian leader says a FREE press is the enemy of the people. And an adversarial press performs an important function in our society, the press as watchdog. Imagine a 100% compliant press. A president could do as he pleases, without ever fearing criticism or exposure. Very attractive scenario for any authoritarian Or simply eliminate the press altogether and have a single state run media.

The one thing you demonstrate more then anything else is a complete lack of appreciation for our history, and for the importance of a free press. The Times publishes an important article, I linked to it earlier, documenting how Trump has cried "witch hunt" in public, cried "deep state" in public, while working in private to interfere in investigations involving his campaign, or, in the case of the District of Southern New York's investigation of Cohen and hush funds, Trump asked that someone favorable to himself be appointed to oversee that investigation. That sure smells like obstruction.

Yet, Trump's response is to call the Times "the enemy of the people". How you can not see that Trump's response is simply Trump attacking anybody shedding light on...Trump....is beyond me.

Your posts seem to be the posts of a man who does not appreciate our democracy at all. It's as if you actually hate our democracy, hate the role of a free press. You are exactly what an authoritarian leader hopes for in every citizen. SMH....

 

[Red]

Is the New York times news or opinions?

They publish both. And it will say right at the top of the page. It will say "opinion" if that is what it is. Duh!!

And the long Times article I posted in this thread a few pages ago is investigative journalism. Duh!!

 

[Red]

So anyway, yesterday seemed to be all about strong rumors that Mueller's report would be delivered to AG Barr next week. I found this piece to be helpful, in pointing out 7 possible outcomes where Mueller's report is concerned. 7 ways his probe might wrap up:

https://www.wired.com/story/mueller-russia-probe-trump-wrap-up-scenarios/

 

[Red]

If there even is a "report", the conclusion of Mueller's role in investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election, is, at the least, likely to trigger a prolonged struggle of the press, the public, Congress, the Justice Department, and Trump regarding that "report" and how much of it the public will ever see. Right up to the Supreme Court perhaps. Meanwhile, spin off investigations from Mueller's work, that may imperil Trump even more then the Russian interference investigation, as well as investigations by various House committees, will continue.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/02/21/politics/donald-trump-robert-mueller-report-questions/index.html

 

[Alfalfa]

 

[Ron Mexico]

Here, let me help you since you want to avoid using the actual definition of propaganda.

View attachment 6804 View attachment 6805 View attachment 6806

Thanks for posting the definition, of which a news paper allowing people to share their opinions on an issue does not match it's definition at all.

I did get a good chuckle out of this one though. But your opinion on media makes more sense to me now. You just don't understand it. I guess people do fear what they don't know.

 

[Hotdog]

Thanks for posting the definition, of which a news paper allowing people to share their opinions on an issue does not match it's definition at all.

I did get a good chuckle out of this one though. But your opinion on media makes more sense to me now. You just don't understand it. I guess people do fear what they don't know.

So you agree. The New York Times publishes an exorbitant amount of socialist opinions. Frame it however you want. Its propaganda. Its meant to influence the minds of the public. Such as yours. Which is why you defend it so hard. Its become a part of you. Its changed you. So you protect it like its your weed stash.(was going to go with baby, but we know how libs feel about babies)

 

[silesian]

The New York Times publishes an exorbitant amount of socialist opinions. )

Next time you read the Times, count the number of times it provides pro business/ capitalist views and then count the number of times it touts the government / socialism. Report back with your findings.

 

[Harambe]

Next time you read the Times, count the number of times it provides pro business/ capitalist views and then count the number of times it touts the government / socialism. Report back with your findings.

That's not really fair. They do have an opinion section. I recommend requesting a compendium of articles, at least 40, citing and indexing all of them.

 

[silesian]

we know how libs feel about babies)

Just stop. I’m conservative but this whole libs hate kids stuff just shows you’ve been brainwashed and isolated. Start with humility and get off your naive moral high horse.

 

[fishonjazz]

Just stop. I’m conservative but this whole libs hate kids stuff just shows you’ve been brainwashed and isolated. Start with humility and get off your naive moral high horse.

Ya I'm pro-life but I think a woman and her family should have the right to choose. I don't think everyone has to be pro life just cause I am.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[Hotdog]

Ya I'm pro-life but I think a woman and her family should have the right to choose. I don't think everyone has to be pro life just cause I am.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

I think you are actually probably a decent person but just really confused because you want everyone around here to like you.

Make no mistake about it. These libs around here wont think twice bout murdering a baby.

Abortion is a disgusting human act. Anything other than the baby had to be aborted to save the life of the female or she was raped, is down right disgusting. But lazy no responsibility libs will do it just to save their social life.

You should really rethink just how ok you are with liberalism.

 

[Hotdog]

Next time you read the Times, count the number of times it provides pro business/ capitalist views and then count the number of times it touts the government / socialism. Report back with your findings.

I already made that report. Read a few pages back.