What's new

Good Article on the Impending Lockout by David Aldridge

Typical NBA player these days,

''Why would I want to help them win a title? They're not doing anything for me. I'm at risk. I have a lot of risk here. I got my family to feed.''

Was due to make $14.6 million when this quote was said. Guess this athlete. If you're a man, you won't use google. ; )

Oh and just my .02. They're not doing anything for you? Just paying you millions of dollars is all but hey, that's nothing!
 
Games played is one thing and most player's incomes do not nearly fully hinge on such. Statistics based on results are another thing so again, I ask you, what stats would be used?

Not sure what type of stats could be used. Maybe FT %, assists, rebounds. Reasonable stats that wouldn't take away from the game. Have a base for each position, centers for rebounds, PG's for assists etc...If some type of legitamate stat paying figure was in line, I think it would give these players an incentive to work harder on their game instead of looking at, "Well I'm getting paid regardless of how I play." I know that this will never happen. Just stating my opinion. My whole reasoning behind this is athletes attitudes in regards to the game that gets them paid. The $$$ has clouded the players minds on work ethic. Not all of them but most of them.
 
"Players, of course, don't want their paychecks to finance profit certainty when no other business has that kind of arrangement with its workers."

What world do these people live in? Every year people forgo raises or even part of their existing salaries to insure companies stay in the black.

No kidding. I am currently buying a business and part of buying that business includes the employees give up their retirement matching and take pay cuts. "No other business has that kind of arrangement." LOL. That's the problem with most of these writers and politicians. None of them have ever held a job other than teacher, or writer or politician. They have no clue what the real world is like. Another reason I am completely dead against unions. Those statements are ridiculous.
 
No kidding. I am currently buying a business and part of buying that business includes the employees give up their retirement matching and take pay cuts. "No other business has that kind of arrangement." LOL. That's the problem with most of these writers and politicians. None of them have ever held a job other than teacher, or writer or politician. They have no clue what the real world is like. Another reason I am completely dead against unions. Those statements are ridiculous.

In the real world, there's a big difference between employees making concessions and business owners being guaranteed profits. In fact, even aftrr the concessions, if the owners are still losing money, employee wages are one of the first things to be paid.

Unions exist because without them, companies treated their empolyees like bathroom tissues.

It's reasonable for the players to accept enough of a cutback to make the NBA profitable overall (which is in the neighbrhood of a 50-50 split on BRI). It is not reasonable to expect the players to accept 39% of BRI to every individual owner is guaranteed a profit. If the NBA wants every owner to make a profit, first make the NBA profitable overall, and then share the earnings.
 
Unions exist because without them, companies treated their empolyees like bathroom tissues.

Initially yes, but after a while, Union leaders will do anything in their power to stay in power, even if it comes at the cost of the long term health of the hands that feed.
 
Typical NBA player these days,

''Why would I want to help them win a title? They're not doing anything for me. I'm at risk. I have a lot of risk here. I got my family to feed.''

Was due to make $14.6 million when this quote was said. Guess this athlete. If you're a man, you won't use google. ; )

Oh and just my .02. They're not doing anything for you? Just paying you millions of dollars is all but hey, that's nothing!


It was Sprewell wasn't it? Now rep me for my genius.
 
In the real world, there's a big difference between employees making concessions and business owners being guaranteed profits. In fact, even aftrr the concessions, if the owners are still losing money, employee wages are one of the first things to be paid.

Unions exist because without them, companies treated their empolyees like bathroom tissues.

It's reasonable for the players to accept enough of a cutback to make the NBA profitable overall (which is in the neighbrhood of a 50-50 split on BRI). It is not reasonable to expect the players to accept 39% of BRI to every individual owner is guaranteed a profit. If the NBA wants every owner to make a profit, first make the NBA profitable overall, and then share the earnings.

The owners aren't guaranteed profits. Most owners lost money this year. There is nothing wrong with the owners wanting to make money and not LOSE money on their business. They took all the risks, not the players, they should get most of the rewards. There is nothing wrong with that. The ironic thing is, you slam owners for wanting guaranteed profits then say that the players should guarantee their $$$. You can't have it both ways. Either you get guaranteed salaries and the owners get guaranteed profits or neither gets it.

Unions are garbage. They abuse the system. They cost society a lot of money. Why should a high school graduate working at GM get $80,000 for the rest of their life when a lawyer is struggling to get $40,000. If we got rid of unions building costs would drop, plumber costs would drop, car prices would drop, basically everything would become affordable. Unions are garbage.

Treated like bathroom tissues. I have a lot of employees. They get paid well, they get time off, they get lunch bought for them all the time, snacks at work, bonuses, etc. So, that is treating employees like bathroom tissue? Give me a break. To say that all business owners that hire non-unionized employees treat them like crap is a joke. Heck, I bet just as many non-union employees are being taken advantage of as unionized employees.

Take for example, Ronnie Price. I bet he doesn't want a lockout. He wants to play basketball and get paid. But because Derrick Fisher wants to ensure he gets the mid-level exception long after he deserves it, he makes Price, Hayward, Watson, Miles, Kanter, Favors, Burks, etc lose money and sit out. Unions are an old idea that aren't needed anymore.

I do agree with your last paragraph. Lock the players out, make the league profitable (which means making it competitive, cutting salaries, getting rid of guaranteed contracts, etc), then bring it back.
 
Back
Top