If we're going to swing for the fences by trading for Conley, then we need to make some other moves as well.
How are we even in a position where we’re discussing the merits of paying Exum and Favors close to a max cap slot of money.
If the Jazz trade for Conely they could potentially get Harris in free agency too.
Sent from my SM-G965U using JazzFanz mobile app
D-lo and Russell aren't unrealistic or in the dark thoughbut unrealistic wild swings in the dark that don't succeed when you could've had a sure thing ?? And then have to trade for Kevin Love ??
TLDR thread
Is it happening?
I picked a ****** time to get a new job and move to a new city.
But not like Hill at all because his contract is 2 years (like....~100% longer)?
If the Jazz trade for Conely they could potentially get Harris in free agency too.
Sent from my SM-G965U using JazzFanz mobile app
You trade for Conley. Your starting five is: Conley, Mitchell, Someone (Ingles), Favors, Gobert.
Who is a 3/4 that can come off the bench that can shoot? And another guard that can shoot?
For a one year rental? No thats is smart business for a small market long term. As a fan we would love them to swing for the fences. But if you trade Mitchell or Gobert and you dont win it all and the player leaves. The franchise is hurt for a long time. Possibly means Vegas Jazz.Normally I’d agree, but with how wide open the NBA is next year...you have to swing for the fences.