What's new
By:

The official "let's reelect Trump" thread

Stoked said:
I didn’t like a lot of Obama’s policies and didn’t vote for him. Again. There’s a line. He can be the nicest guy ever and if his policies suck I won’t support him. You apparently have no line. And I find the willingness to embrace an extreme like that usually a dangerous thing.
Click to expand...

Fair enough and thanks for the explanation of your stance, I understand where you're coming from better. Again, I did say earlier that if it was someone like a Ted Cruz type, I'd likely lean that direction.

On the same token, I don't overanalyze every little thing that President Trump says and apply a superficial meaning to it. Maybe that's the difference?
 
DasJazz said:
Fair enough and thanks for the explanation of your stance, I understand where you're coming from better. Again, I did say earlier that if it was someone like a Ted Cruz type, I'd likely lean that direction.

On the same token, I don't overanalyze every little thing that President Trump says and apply a superficial meaning to it. Maybe that's the difference?
Click to expand...

If it was a random remark here or there that’s one thing. But it’s remarks daily. Usually several.

Spreading a rumor about a house member being married to her brother, no ability to nuance his language, talking about sexually assaulting women, constant lying, cluelessness shown again and again, personal petty attacks that have nothing to do with policy.
 
Heathme said:
The thought that the President of the United States has to bend over while being attacked is just silly. Go through some old footage of Obama @Stoked. See if he attacked "its people, and ideals, and pretend to support the country." I'll give you a preview, HE DID "attack its people, and ideals, and pretend to support the country."
Click to expand...

Something about how we cling to our religion, guns and God or something like that.
 
Stoked said:
Apology tour? High unemployment? Has there been payments to enemy nations?

I don’t see a lot of these applying to him.
Click to expand...
Trump's snuggling up to Putin and other dictators surely qualifies. Unemployment was around 4.7 in 2016 I think about a percentage less today. Not sure what you mean by foreign payments, the repayment to Iran maybe?
 
idestroyedthetoilet said:
And the TDS moral high horse claims its newest rider (victim).

The best part about no more Trump will be some of y'all shedding your self righteousness and acting normal again. I was thinking today that maybe I am a dick for wanting him re-elected just because some of you (not you Stoked, but you know who I mean) deserve it. Then I thought, dammit, I'll be in a fit for four years too if one of these snivvely, opportunistic, lying little *** helmets gets elected. I don't deserve that and nobody deserved 4 years of Trump either. Gods, please let Biden or Bernie win the election. And FU again to HC and the DNC for destroying Bernue. Now he's damaged goods (we all know Democrats voters prefer fresh, new faces).
Click to expand...

Ahhh China Biden or Socialist Bernie you can really pick them.
 
Zombie said:
Trump's snuggling up to Putin and other dictators surely qualifies. Unemployment was around 4.7 in 2016 I think about a percentage less today. Not sure what you mean by foreign payments, the repayment to Iran maybe?
Click to expand...

As a bad thing? Sure. As an “apology tour”. Nah.

Iran payment is the Only thing I can think of. I didn’t bring up the terms. Merely running with them.
 
Stoked said:
As a bad thing? Sure. As an “apology tour”. Nah.

Iran payment is the Only thing I can think of. I didn’t bring up the terms. Merely running with them.
Click to expand...
Yeah I got you. I would argue Trump's defense of Putin's involvement in our past election and throwing our intelligence services under the bus qualifies.
 
I don't think he should be reelected. You know, for reasons like these:
  • racism
  • sex crimes
  • concentration camps
  • corruption
  • traitor
  • obstruction of justice
  • attacks on rule of law
  • assault on freedom of the press
  • pathological lying
  • unfitness for office
  • incompetence
  • attacks on our most important allies and alliances
  • systematic destruction of our environment
  • violation of international treaties and agreements
  • embrace of our enemies
  • defense of murdering dictators
  • serial undermining of our national security
  • nepotism
  • attacks on our federal law enforcement and intelligence communities
  • fiscal recklessness
  • degradation of the office and of public discourse in America
  • support of Nazis and white supremacists
  • the dead in Puerto Rico and the at the border
  • turning the US government into a criminal conspiracy to empower and enrich the president and his supporters
  • weaponization of politics in America to attack the weak
 
Zombie said:
Yeah I got you. I would argue Trump's defense of Putin's involvement in our past election and throwing our intelligence services under the bus qualifies.
Click to expand...

Oh absolutely. Lots of bad about him.

Like his ban on immigration from various nations (it wasn’t a “Muslim” ban) and his desire for a wall
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top