What's new

El Paso Shooting

Annnndddd that’s why I reacted the way I did yesterday when Jazzfresh tried to engage in political talk with me. He has a history of trolling. Trying to blame warren as if she’s said anything close to the inflammatory rhetoric we’ve heard nonstop from trump since 2015 is just garbage.
"So do we blame Elizabeth Warren(my vote right now), and demand every Democrat to renounce Antifa?

I say no"

I actually did the opposite but typical of you to construe some crazy *** fantasy up.
 
Did you intentionally miss this part just so you could push your usual mean spirited diatribe?

"Elizabeth Warren(my vote right now)"

People like you are the reason moderates like me are having a hard time voting left. You sit and talk all **** on Trump and rightfully so, yet you act no different than him.
The second part of your post kind of undercuts the rest of it. As for you being a Trumper, I got you mixed up with Jazzrule again, blech, I'm sorry.

My point stands on the rest though, we aren't tying the El Paso guy to Trump our of nowhere. His manifesto could be mistaken for Trump's twitter feed.
 
"So do we blame Elizabeth Warren(my vote right now), and demand every Democrat to renounce Antifa?

I say no"

I actually did the opposite but typical of you to construe some crazy *** fantasy up.

Your last few posts are great evidence of trolling.

I’m plugged into the political science scene both at an academic level and social level and the only person I’ve ever heard being up Warren’s rhetoric has been you. And for good reason, her rhetoric isn’t racist, misogynistic, or inflammatory. Unlike trump’s, which is inciting violence everywhere he goes:



Find a similar correlation with Warren then we might have a discussion. Otherwise, you’re trolling.

Now you claim that you said, “no” but literally no one is making that argument let alone “consensus.”

And ANTIFA? Why would you bring them up? They’re not slaughtering people in synagogues, mosques, churches, or Walmart’s. They’re not running people over at “unite the right” marches. No prominent politician is using ANTIFA rhetoric to get votes.

We all know about Steve king. But look at what TEXAS Senator John Coryn wrote just a few weeks ago:



Here’s what Happened at one of Donald’s rallies just a few months ago:



And we act surprised that this happened?

Until you can point to similar events on the left, don’t even bring up ANTIFA or Warren.

This is why chasing after voters predisposed to vote republican no matter what is worthless for democrats. No matter what we do you’ll always find a way to both sides the issue. Want trump? Vote for him. But stop with the games. Enough with the facade that you’re trying to be fair and balanced. You play these games, ask stupid questions from a very republican point of view to troll, then whine when people call you out for it.

It’s getting old that whenever we bring up white supremacy that some here have to bring up BLM and ANTIFA, as if there’s any comparison between the three.
 
The second part of your post kind of undercuts the rest of it.
Hey man I want anybody but Trump at this point. It's time for healing and that buffoon would rather stroke his ego than bring this nation together. Problem is, I can't even post an opinion without the extremist left(you) spouting meanness for absolutely no reason. Scares the **** out of me. Both parties are nothing but radicals anymore. I like Warren because I think she can bring that calmness. I may not entirely like her platform but compared to most others, she actually has one outside of the divisive my party vs your party bigotry.
 
Hey man I want anybody but Trump at this point. It's time for healing and that buffoon would rather stroke his ego than bring this nation together. Problem is, I can't even post an opinion without the extremist left(you) spouting meanness for absolutely no reason. Scares the **** out of me. Both parties are nothing but radicals anymore.

Which is absolute nonsense. Not supported at all by data. Democrats aren’t radicals at all. Historically, democrats haven’t moved significantly Over to the left. And internationally, they’re conservative. The most liberal democrats would be conservatives literally everywhere else in the industrialized world.

Single payer health care
Gun regulation
Progressive taxation
Women’s rights (choice)
Believing in science (climate change)
Treating immigrants like human beings (not committing war crimes or torture on them)

Aren't radical positions unless you’re already operating at an extreme right point of view. Which would make you the radical, not them.
 
Hey man I want anybody but Trump at this point. It's time for healing and that buffoon would rather stroke his ego than bring this nation together. Problem is, I can't even post an opinion without the extremist left(you) spouting meanness for absolutely no reason. Scares the **** out of me. Both parties are nothing but radicals anymore. I like Warren because I think she can bring that calmness. I may not entirely like her platform but compared to most others, she actually has one outside of the divisive my party vs your party bigotry.
First off I'm not a "far leftist" secondly, if my first post scares the hell out of you I'd suggest you toughen up, it's a big old mean world out there. Nothing I said was even particularly mean lol.
 
First off I'm not a "far leftist" secondly, if my first post scares the hell out of you I'd suggest you toughen up, it's a big old mean world out there. Nothing I said was even particularly mean lol.

LVdRj-sqeEuiOaxKjJG-6R0g7b0C_xjJNcUWc4Up9dg.jpg
 
Which is absolute nonsense. Not supported at all by data. Democrats aren’t radicals at all. Historically, democrats haven’t moved significantly Over to the left. And internationally, they’re conservative. The most liberal democrats would be conservatives literally everywhere else in the industrialized world.

Single payer health care
Gun regulation
Progressive taxation
Women’s rights (choice)
Believing in science (climate change)

Aren't radical positions
No they are not. By radicalized I mean this antifa type **** that if you disagree with something you are a "Trumper racist blah blah blah". Both of you automatically and wrongfully accused me of something and retaliated with vile attacks. For no reason.


This is the norm these days. Adults that can't even conversate without insults. We wonder why bad **** is always happening yet we don't look in the mirror on how we treat one another. "You disagree with me you're a bad person" ********. And yeah this goes both ways.

I live in Trump territory and 99% of these people are good loving humans.

I've lived in Obama territory and the same.

Being a dick to anyone just because of their political affiliation is nothing short of bigotry and highlights the problem with this country. We hate each other...
 
First off I'm not a "far leftist" secondly, if my first post scares the hell out of you I'd suggest you toughen up, it's a big old mean world out there. Nothing I said was even particularly mean lol.

So he personally believes Warren brings calmness but claimed that there was a consensus (somewhere? On the board? On twitter?) that her rhetoric was inciting violence on the level of trump, which has inspired at least 3 mass shooters and one white van pipe bomber.

Warren is one of the most “liberal” candidates. He also likes parts of her platform and claims that she appears to be a bipartisan figure, yet also claims that “both parties are radical.”

Oookay... so Warren is everything. Calm yet inciting violence. Has a good platform that might garner bipartisan support yet is one of the most radical of the radical party.

Cool
 
No they are not. By radicalized I mean this antifa type **** that if you disagree with something you are a "Trumper racist blah blah blah". Both of you automatically and wrongfully accused me of something and retaliated with vile attacks. For no reason.


This is the norm these days. Adults that can't even conversate without insults. We wonder why bad **** is always happening yet we don't look in the mirror on how we treat one another. "You disagree with me you're a bad person" ********. And yeah this goes both ways.

I live in Trump territory and 99% of these people are good loving humans.

I've lived in Obama territory and the same.

Being a dick to anyone just because of their political affiliation is nothing short of bigotry.

And there we go again. ANTIFA. The scary word of the day. What relevance does it have? Who the hell knows?
 
So he personally believes Warren brings calmness but claimed that there was a consensus (somewhere? On the board? On twitter?) that her rhetoric was inciting violence on the level of trump, which has inspired at least 3 mass shooters and one white van pipe bomber.

Warren is one of the most “liberal” candidates. He also likes parts of her platform and claims that she appears to be a bipartisan figure, yet also claims that “both parties are radical.”

Oookay... so Warren is everything. Calm yet inciting violence. Has a good platform that might garner bipartisan support yet is one of the most radical of the radical party.

Cool
I think he was referring to tying Trump to the shooter by the "general consensus" bit. It was really poorly worded though.
 
So he personally believes Warren brings calmness but claimed that there was a consensus (somewhere? On the board? On twitter?) that her rhetoric was inciting violence on the level of trump, which has inspired at least 3 mass shooters and one white van pipe bomber.

Warren is one of the most “liberal” candidates. He also likes parts of her platform and claims that she appears to be a bipartisan figure, yet also claims that “both parties are radical.”

Oookay... so Warren is everything. Calm yet inciting violence. Has a good platform that might garner bipartisan support yet is one of the most radical of the radical party.

Cool
You have a weird imagination brotha. How you got all of that out of a paragraph or two is intriguing. I think you are reading what you want to read. I never said a majority of this. Actually any of it. You made the whole thing up lol.
 
Back
Top