Free Assange

[Getting Traded]

Yes, I listened to Yahoo’s Conspiracyland podcast about this, you could learn something. The Dutch TV Interviewer was shocked by Assange spewing such rhetoric on his show. In fact, he felt bad because he felt like he was being used by Assange to promote disinformation. So clearly, this interviewer didn’t feel confident about Rich being Assange’s source. So why did you bring this up? You think this... builds your case?

Not only is there zero evidence to support that Rich was Assange’s source, there’s plenty of evidence to show that the hacked emails came from Russian attackers. These teams in Russian intelligence were called Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear. We don’t need to speculate. Like we know it was them due to tactics and malware that Russian intelligence uses.

For those who want to learn about Russian intelligence:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fancy_Bear
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cozy_Bear

for those wanting to learn about the Seth Rich story (I don’t have the time to debunk all the crap Ernie has in his head):

https://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-th...acy-a-yahoo-news-investigation-100000831.html

And of course there’s the Mueller report that dunks on Eenie too. I could tell you which pages to look up on the Mueller report but I see kicky already posted a page and it hasn’t stopped these imbeciles from posting their garbage.

You fall for the disinformation fed by our Deep State. For one, while I hate Trump as much as you do, the Muellar Report is Deep State motivated. As I said before, it's all a cover for the DNC fraud. By the way, did you see who is the Chairperson of the board of FP, the periodical that casts apersions on Assange, Penny Pritzler, a billionaire who's also on the board of the Council of Foreign Relations, a notoriously Deep State organization going back decades. Are you familiar with the work of C. Wright Mills, whose Power Elite written in the late 1950s was the first to delineate the how the branches of government were infiltrated by corporate leaders which dictated U.S. Policy, or perhaps we should call it, The American Empire, whose military has dominated the World with the justification of keeping the world safe for democracy.

There was a hacker, Guccifer, who actually made these files public if you were paying attention. I was, and downloaded them circa April 2016. You want me to send them to you and prove it. I believe Guccifer who claimed to be Romanian was actually Seth Rich. So, can you tell me who or why Seth Rich was murdered, shot in the back with nothing stolen from him? Who wanted him dead and for what reason? Can you explain that? Of course his parents are going to deny everything. They're probably too frightened to tell the truth.

The disinformation is coming from the Deep State, just as it sometimes comes from MSM, which is controlled by the Deep State. Read C. Wright Mills, and you will get a good idea who comprises the Deep State, though of course there have been changes since then. And the Deep State does not approve of Trump. They favor Globalism and continued warfare.

Another question you've ignored is, do you believe Assange should not have released that Iraq War video of the psychotic U.S. Army helicopter pilots shooting down civilians?

If you don't, then you're a party to the Deep State and its tyrannical control of the U.S. and the rest of the world.

 

[Getting Traded]

I just scanned the supposed debunking of the murder of Rich.

First of all you need to explain the reason for his murder. It was not a botched robbery. He was shot in the back with no attempt to rob him.

Second, I received the Guccifer files months before July 2016. They were available for anyone who wanted to download them, and I did. I just looked at the date I received them; it was April 26.

So, I guess you believe U.S. Intelligence agencies whose MO has for 60 years been disinformation and outright lying. Your sources cite heinous people like Mike Pompeo who while a Senator was a shill for Monsanto and led the fight to prevent the mandatory labeling of products that contained GMOs in the U.S.

Can you tell me what Assange's motives have been? Are the Russians paying him, and if he were a Russian agent, then why didn't he seek asylum in Russia like Snowden? You can cite all the b.s. American sources you want and I won't believe them because to the Deep State Americans (the Deep State is international), he is their enemy. They continue to lie to us about JFK, about 9-11, about WMDs, about Jessica Lynch, about Pat Tillman, about Benghazi, about Guantanamo, about Global Warming, and about Russia. The whole anti-communist threat was more bluff and bravado than truth. The Cold War was a sham to feed the military and the industrial complex that supported it. Read the books written by disillusioned CIA agents -- I have. America could be a great country but it's run by a bunch thieves and thugs who want to dominate the world. It's not a pretty picture but it's the truth and that's what Assange has been fighting and trying to expose.

How about listening to some real journalists like John Pilger, the Australian who has been reporting on wars since Vietnam and a truth teller:

I should tell you that there is a cautionary message shown when you go to the link for this film. It has the clip from the famous video that Chelsea Manning linked to Wikileaks which caused her to be arrested and which got Assange in hot water, the one with the psychotic Army helicopters. The U.S. doesn't want us to know the truth about their wars, about all the "collateral damage" they cause. You know what that is, I hope. Stop listening to the disinformation and get the real truth, not that presented by the Deep State. Why do you think they oppose Bernie, even a mild Progressive like Elizabeth Warren, and of course they hate AOC. These are the politicians we need to support, to fight the oppression, and the lies they feed us. Assange is a hero and their enemy, but he is fighting for us. We need to open our eyes.

 

[Getting Traded]

Yes, I listened to Yahoo’s Conspiracyland podcast about this, you could learn something. The Dutch TV Interviewer was shocked by Assange spewing such rhetoric on his show. In fact, he felt bad because he felt like he was being used by Assange to promote disinformation. So clearly, this interviewer didn’t feel confident about Rich being Assange’s source. So why did you bring this up? You think this... builds your case?

Not only is there zero evidence to support that Rich was Assange’s source, there’s plenty of evidence to show that the hacked emails came from Russian attackers. These teams in Russian intelligence were called Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear. We don’t need to speculate. Like we know it was them due to tactics and malware that Russian intelligence uses.

For those who want to learn about Russian intelligence:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fancy_Bear
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cozy_Bear

for those wanting to learn about the Seth Rich story (I don’t have the time to debunk all the crap Ernie has in his head):

https://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-th...acy-a-yahoo-news-investigation-100000831.html

And of course there’s the Mueller report that dunks on Eenie too. I could tell you which pages to look up on the Mueller report but I see kicky already posted a page and it hasn’t stopped these imbeciles from posting their garbage.

By the way Wikipedia has been shown to have been affected by disinformation. You need to carefully examine its sources, and then you need to examine the objectivity of the sources, who might be funding them, etc. The Internet is great for getting information but you need to parse it carefully. If someone / some organization has a profit-making agenda, then you need to question them.

 

[Getting Traded]

You know that joke you used when you were younger, and said, “What? Did you hit your head when you were a child?” Yeah, @Eenie-Meenie had to have heard that a few dozen times.

Actually, when I was about 3 years old I tumbled down a flight of stairs and sustained a cut above my eye and had to be taken to the hospital. Apparently, then, that is when I became a genius. But you know when you see things most people don't, it can be difficult.

 

[Jazzta]

The truth is the truth. You surprise me by being so wedded to your failing institutions.

Thriller’s the kind of guy that would vote for a turd just to get Trump out of office. Either way we’ ****ed. I still think he’s got something in it, the way he posts a dozen mainstream news pieces a day, taking them for undeniable truth.

 

[Harambe]

The truth is the truth. You surprise me by being so wedded to your failing institutions.

Sure, he released truths. And then it took some time to expose that he purposefully withheld, maybe even hid other truths that are probably more damming.

Doesn't that sound awfully like living long enough to become the villain?

 

[Harambe]

Thriller’s the kind of guy that would vote for a turd just to get Trump out of office. Either way we’ ****ed. I still think he’s got something in it, the way he posts a dozen mainstream news pieces a day, taking them for undeniable truth.

I mean... Didn't you do the same? Vote for a piece of **** to keep Hillary out of office?

 

[Harambe]

By the way Wikipedia has been shown to have been affected by disinformation. You need to carefully examine its sources, and then you need to examine the objectivity of the sources, who might be funding them, etc. The Internet is great for getting information but you need to parse it carefully. If someone / some organization has a profit-making agenda, then you need to question them.

You don't get to soap box about sources after citing a guy that believes alzheimers is just type 3 diabetes.

 

[Jazzta]

I mean... Didn't you do the same? Vote for a piece of **** to keep Hillary out of office?

Yes, I voted for him because he was going to drain the swamp, lock her up etc... regretted voting for him a couple months into office. He hasn’t done ****. I will have no problem not voting at all next time if the candidates aren’t good enough.

 

[Deleted member 365]

Thriller’s the kind of guy that would vote for a turd just to get Trump out of office. Either way we’ ****ed. I still think he’s got something in it, the way he posts a dozen mainstream news pieces a day, taking them for undeniable truth.

First of all, would a turd sell our country out the same way Donald has?
Secondly, why would Hillary have “****ed” us? Why would a Biden/Warren/Mayor Pete/Sanders presidency “****” us? I love how those who know the least about history and are the most informed by Russia Today are the ones who most fearful of a Democratic presidency.

 

[Deleted member 365]

Sure, he released truths. And then it took some time to expose that he purposefully withheld, maybe even hid other truths that are probably more damming.

Doesn't that sound awfully like living long enough to become the villain?

Except, he hasn’t released truths. Yes, he has released hacked material against the west. How do we know they haven’t been tampered with? Why doesn’t he release material from Russia? Why does he suppress some hacked material from countries that amplifies his platform?

He lies incessantly. Assange has a decade long history of aiding authoritarian Russia. He lied about Seth Rich. He has promoted anti-western conspiracies and has aided Russia in its disinformation campaign to destroy liberal and free democracies. He lies today about helping Russia. I’m sorry, but Assange isn’t Daniel Ellsberg

 

[Harambe]

Except, he hasn’t released truths. Yes, he has released hacked material against the west. Why doesn’t he release material from Russia?

He lies incessantly. Assange has a decade long history of aiding authoritarian Russia. He lied about Seth Rich. He has promoted anti-western conspiracies and has aided Russia in its disinformation campaign to destroy liberal and free democracies. He lies today about helping Russia. I’m sorry, but Assange isn’t Daniel Ellsberg

Hacked materials are by definition truths. Until its released that he hacked faked materials.

Assange has a lot to answer for, and in my opinion his choice of what to release and not to release is at the top of the list.

Hence my suggestion; a fully transparent trial. Give him a chance to share his side of the story. It's not like he trapped someone.

Oh wait...