D
Deleted member 365
Guest
Again you're not reading my post. I said that he has played at an all star level in the PAST.
Winning a championship is all about giving yourself the best odds possible.
Let's say you need a player who can give you 15 minutes a night in a big playoff series. Which option gives you the better chance of winning.... a player who *CAN* play at an all star level or a player who cant? It's a pretty simple answer.
If we are legitimately trying to contend we don't trade Conley for bench pieces. Doesn't matter how bad he's playing. Lowering your potential ceiling is not the way to a chip.
Now if we can actually get a better player like CP3, that's a different story.
No. I read it. When in the past was he playing at an allstar level? How far back are you going to go to justify his roster spot? And how does he give us the best chance to win a championship when it’s a legitimate argument whether he’s better than 3rd string Mudiay on a minimum salary?
Mitchell is better than Conley. Clarkson is better than Conley. And one could argue whether Mudiay is better than Conley. Right now, Conley might be our worst guard yet he’s paid the most and you claim he’s our best shot at winning a championship? Why? Because he was an all-star at some point in his career?