What's new
By:

.

Beer said:
You'd have to think he'd require way more than a mediocre at best RB and a mid round 1 to get. I'm thinking a functional starter plus mutliple 1's and 2's over the next few years.
Click to expand...

I said #14, Jones, a 3rd this year, and a 3rd next.

The Giants could get Simmons at 4, one of the 3 LT’s at 14 (or move up one to three spots to get thee one they want) to get their LT (Solder blows) or even another LB like the OU kid...and draft Dobbins/Akers later. Basically they’d upgrade at LT ( a need), get an elite defender in Simmons (in theory), get Jones and Dobbins/Akers to replace Barkley, AND pick up two thirds in the process and save about 14M next year (Barkley will get about 17M minus about 3M for pick 14 I am guessing)...
 
Wes Mantooth said:
I said #14, Jones, a 3rd this year, and a 3rd next.

The Giants could get Simmons at 4, one of the 3 LT’s at 14 (or move up one to three spots to get thee one they want) to get their LT (Solder blows) or even another LB like the OU kid...and draft Dobbins/Akers later. Basically they’d upgrade at LT ( a need), get an elite defender in Simmons (in theory), get Jones and Dobbins/Akers to replace Barkley, AND pick up two thirds in the process and save about 14M next year (Barkley will get about 17M minus about 3M for pick 14 I am guessing)...
Click to expand...
Wes Mantooth said:
I said #14, Jones, a 3rd this year, and a 3rd next.

The Giants could get Simmons at 4, one of the 3 LT’s at 14 (or move up one to three spots to get thee one they want) to get their LT (Solder blows) or even another LB like the OU kid...and draft Dobbins/Akers later. Basically they’d upgrade at LT ( a need), get an elite defender in Simmons (in theory), get Jones and Dobbins/Akers to replace Barkley, AND pick up two thirds in the process and save about 14M next year (Barkley will get about 17M minus about 3M for pick 14 I am guessing)...
Click to expand...

Would you do this @tfivas?

You get Barkley, address OL or DB in the 2nd..and still have two 4ths...
 
Wes Mantooth said:
I said #14, Jones, a 3rd this year, and a 3rd next.

The Giants could get Simmons at 4, one of the 3 LT’s at 14 (or move up one to three spots to get thee one they want) to get their LT (Solder blows) or even another LB like the OU kid...and draft Dobbins/Akers later. Basically they’d upgrade at LT ( a need), get an elite defender in Simmons (in theory), get Jones and Dobbins/Akers to replace Barkley, AND pick up two thirds in the process and save about 14M next year (Barkley will get about 17M minus about 3M for pick 14 I am guessing)...
Click to expand...

Still, I think he gets multiple ones and an actual good player which Ronald Jones is not.
 
Heard a rumor the 49ers offered the best deal to get OBJ last year but the Giants chose to send him to the AFC, didn’t want to deal with him in nfc or something.

It makes me happy, and hope the 49ers aren’t trying to trade for him now.
 
I’d think long and hard about offering 13, 31 in this years draft. He could possibly ensure a return to the Super Bowl the offense would be unstoppable with an elite defense.
 
Thee jazz fan said:
If I were 49ers gm I’d try getting Barkley. Imagine him in the 49ers run scheme he could put up some ungodly numbers there.
Click to expand...

Not a shock that you’d be for this, idiot that you are. Spending money on running backs is pretty much the dumbest thing you can do as a GM.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top