Players only meeting.

[Gameface]

I think Archie has been pretty patient here.

Has he posted stupid ****? Sure. I'm certainly not going to be the one to throw stones on that.

But ****ing hell, the guy is open to honest discussion. Give him a break.

If I could I would award Archie two Jazfanz awards

Lifetime Most Personal Growth -- not even close, he takes this.

Current Most Unbiased Poster -- again, I think he runs away with it.

He might post stuff you think is "off limits" but he usually does it while asking actual honest questions about the content. It would be cool if people would just take him at his word and engage him on the very reasonable and honest terms he lays out.

 

[Archie Moses]

Ok. Post your poll.

The whole idea behind doing something so silly to that extent is the difference between you and I. It's like you're trapped back in middle school. You get off on the idea of making fun of people and their appearances or making polls like, "who does Jazzfanz like more? Dutch or Thriller?" You usually only show up when there's a bunch of people laying into someone like a beta hyena.

You're so cool, NAOS. You must be so manly and ultra good looking. You tuff and bad ***.

 

[NAOS]

The whole idea behind doing something so silly to that extent is the difference between you and I. It's like you're trapped back in middle school. You get off on the idea of making fun of people and their appearances or making polls like, "who does Jazzfanz like more? Dutch or Thriller?" You usually only show up when there's a bunch of people laying into someone like a beta hyena.

You're so cool, NAOS. You must be so manly and ultra good looking. You tuff and bad ***.

you’ve misrecognized One Brow in the last couple of pages. Im just trying to help you see a different perspective and correct the misrecognition.

 

[NAOS]

I think Archie has been pretty patient here.

Has he posted stupid ****? Sure. I'm certainly not going to be the one to throw stones on that.

But ****ing hell, the guy is open to honest discussion. Give him a break.

If I could I would award Archie two Jazfanz awards

Lifetime Most Personal Growth -- not even close, he takes this.

Current Most Unbiased Poster -- again, I think he runs away with it.

He might post stuff you think is "off limits" but he usually does it while asking actual honest questions about the content. It would be cool if people would just take him at his word and engage him on the very reasonable and honest terms he lays out.

I think you should check your brake fluid and then start pumping the pedal a little bit. Or a lot.

 

[Gameface]

I think you should check your brake fluid and then start pumping the pedal a little bit. Or a lot.

Sorry for not joining the mob...

My brakes are tight as ****.

 

[Archie Moses]

I think Archie has been pretty patient here.

Has he posted stupid ****? Sure. I'm certainly not going to be the one to throw stones on that.

But ****ing hell, the guy is open to honest discussion. Give him a break.

If I could I would award Archie two Jazfanz awards

Lifetime Most Personal Growth -- not even close, he takes this.

Current Most Unbiased Poster -- again, I think he runs away with it.

He might post stuff you think is "off limits" but he usually does it while asking actual honest questions about the content. It would be cool if people would just take him at his word and engage him on the very reasonable and honest terms he lays out.

Thanks, man.

I'll be the first one to admit I've posted stupid **** or I'm wrong.

 

[NAOS]

Sorry for not joining the mob...

My brakes are tight as ****.

There is no mob.

 

[Archie Moses]

There is no mob.

Perhaps you should post a poll? If that doesn't work, maybe you can make fun of Gameface and reference his shirt from a picture from 10 years ago?

 

[Gameface]

There is no mob.

Whatever.

I see a person saying that they are trying to understand and a group telling them they are stupid for not understanding better.

Then I say "hey, maybe we should help this person understand." and the response is "pump your brakes, fool."

So whatever.

 

[NAOS]

Whatever.

I see a person saying that they are trying to understand and a group telling them they are stupid for not understanding better.

Then I say "hey, maybe we should help this person understand." and the response is "pump your brakes, fool."

So whatever.

I said to pump your brakes vis-a-vis the mountain of praise..... not vis-a-vis helping him understand something. I’m sorry that wasn’t clear.

And the immediate context is pretty clear here. He’s been ramming his head against One Brow for a solid 2 or 3 month span—whilst continuing to put forward the same false equivalences and increasing the amount of name calling.

I have stepped into a few of these exchanges. This is just one. That part you probably didn’t know.

 

[lauriandres]

Why is it considered some kind of a win that it is possible to vote in the sports arenas? Aren't the voting usually done in buildings that belong to local or federal government? And if you are disabled, live in remote location etc, then government officials will visit your house with the voting box. Doesn't the voting law specify that there must be enough voting locations according to the population density?

For example, in Estonia at least in the capital (population about 400 000) the voting is on sundays and usually at local public schools. The local school density is about 1 per 1-4 km2. The distance between the voting place and my house was about 1 km (10 minute walking). Even before e-voting it was possible to also vote one week before the official date at the "global" voting centre, but on the official day you had to vote on your local location. Local location was determined by your official address, so for those who actually lived elsewhere they had to use an earlier date. Of course, due the e-voting about 50% of those who actually vote use the e-voting possibility. I (and also my wife and mother) used that method while being in the hotel room in Japan in may 2019 (EU parliament voting).

 

[Archie Moses]

I said to pump your brakes vis-a-vis the mountain of praise..... not vis-a-vis helping him understand something. I’m sorry that wasn’t clear.

And the immediate context is pretty clear here. He’s been ramming his head against One Brow for a solid 2 or 3 month span—whilst continuing to put forward the same false equivalences and increasing the amount of name calling.

I have stepped into a few of these exchanges. This is just one. That part you probably didn’t know.

2 or 3 months? Lol

OB and I go back way further than that.

The thing that's annoying about you is you jump in while being a condescending *** hat that tries to get your burn in or you make some bland, generic statement that I'm not arguing against.

If you could provide me specific examples of what I've written or said that's so looney or cringe worthy, I'd think about it.

With One Brow, I can literally write or say exactly what he thinks or believes but I'll add something and then he'll argue that while changing my entire argument into something it's not. It's actually pretty damn good trolling but I don't think he's meaning to troll.

For example, the video I posted that showed the Portland shooting while arguing Portland is a **** hole that has both the radical right and rioters destroying the city. This argument gets changed into you just posted a tweet from a Malaysian right winger, you should do research before you post. I posted a video. A video that OB said was highly edited - it wasn't at all.

I don't have Twitter downloaded on my phone but I know how to use Google and tweets are easy to embed. The idea that people think that I some how follow or know who guys like Cheong is laughable - especially when just posted tweets condemning the Proud Boys and showing one of their leaders pulling a gun on people multiple times. I found that after reading about it on Yahoo and then Google'd it looking for a video.

The majority of what people on here argue against is made up in their head. Zombie just showed a perfect example of this by dismissing Tim Pool and thinking he's far right because he saw a thumbnail with the title of one of his videos.

Log made a great post about this the other night.

 

[NAOS]

2 or 3 months? Lol

OB and I go back way further than that.

The thing that's annoying about you is you jump in while being a condescending *** hat that tries to get your burn in or you make some bland, generic statement that I'm not arguing against.

If you could provide me specific examples of what I've written or said that's so looney or cringe worthy, I'd think about it.

With One Brow, I can literally write or say exactly what he thinks or believes but I'll add something and then he'll argue that while changing my entire argument into something it's not. It's actually pretty damn good trolling but I don't think he's meaning to troll.

For example, the video I posted that showed the Portland shooting while arguing Portland is a **** hole that has both the radical right and rioters destroying the city. This argument gets changed into you just posted a tweet from a Malaysian right winger, you should do research before you post. I posted a video. A video that OB said was highly edited - it wasn't at all.

I don't have Twitter downloaded on my phone but I know how to use Google and tweets are easy to embed. The idea that people think that I some how follow or know who guys like Cheong is laughable - especially when just posted tweets condemning the Proud Boys and showing one of their leaders pulling a gun on people multiple times. I found that after reading about it on Yahoo and then Google'd it looking for a video.

The majority of what people on here argue against is made up in their head. Zombie just showed a perfect example of this by dismissing Tim Pool and thinking he's far right because he saw a thumbnail with the title of one of his videos.

Log made a great post about this the other night.

The operative word was “span.” I know that you and One Brow go back much further. There have been multiple SPANS.

It’s been pretty eye-opening watching you normalize the idea of a Police State lately, among other things.

Again, you’re mischaracterizing One Brow—both his points and his rhetoric. You’re flailing, not him.

 

[One Brow]

Arguing with you is like trying to knit fog.

Should I apologize for trying to ask you to justify your statements?

 

[One Brow]

I'm not surprised you're in the same corner as the guy who argued the lable of sexual misconduct... err... rape.

That was an error on my part. I again thank @Loggrard98, @JazzSpazz, and @NAOS for calling me out on it, Blake did digitally rape his spouse.

That doesn't change the wrongness of using a months-old interaction to justify shooting the guy when his back was turned.

 

[One Brow]

Why is it considered some kind of a win that it is possible to vote in the sports arenas? Aren't the voting usually done in buildings that belong to local or federal government? And if you are disabled, live in remote location etc, then government officials will visit your house with the voting box. Doesn't the voting law specify that there must be enough voting locations according to the population density?

No, we don't have any of that. In consecutive elections I have voted in an elementary school and then a church. The is no requirement about ease of voting, the lines in urban area can be very long compared to suburban voting.

 

[lauriandres]

No, we don't have any of that. In consecutive elections I have voted in an elementary school and then a church. The is no requirement about ease of voting, the lines in urban area can be very long compared to suburban voting.

So in theory is it already according to law, when the voting organizers (or some special government funded department), provides a la at least one building with couple of servicing-monitoring persons for the entire big city? For example, in NYC - is it possible, that there are no voting places at Manhattan, if the New York major or state does not want to provide rooms in some building?
If yes, then why there are not protests with a theme a la VotersTimeMatters or VotingShouldBeEasy? That should IMHO be suitable to everybody no matter what is the race or political party preference?

 

[One Brow]

So in theory is it already according to law, when the voting organizers (or some special government funded department), provides a la at least one building with couple of servicing-monitoring persons for the entire big city? For example, in NYC - is it possible, that there are no voting places at Manhattan, if the New York major or state does not want to provide rooms in some building?
If yes, then why there are not protests with a theme a la VotersTimeMatters or VotingShouldBeEasy? That should IMHO be suitable to everybody no matter what is the race or political party preference?

I don't think people expect voting to be any different here.

States have to provide guidelines for setting up voting places, and there will always be a willing hosts.

 

[Archie Moses]

That was an error on my part. I again thank @Loggrard98, @JazzSpazz, and @NAOS
That doesn't change the wrongness of using a months-old interaction to justify shooting the guy when his back was turned.

Yet, I never did that. It's weird how you can translate **** like this into meaning that. I can literally write he didn't deserve to be shot and yet you turn that into thinking I think he did because his criminal history gets brought up.

 

[Archie Moses]

I agree that the "Fox" still exists now but can you answer who the Fox is or why do you think Lebron is a puppet for white liberals?

I think the fox can be a number of different types of people like the antifa's distraction of BLM. The Fox can be those who's best interests is motivated by money and profits. The Fox is the guy that says racist things behind close doors while being the first to condemn others.

I think James is a puppet because of his comments on many things. He's inauthentic and dives into politics head first and is a phony.



Remember when he said Morey was "misinformed" and "not educated?"

What does LeBron do to calm down black anger for the benefit of white capitalists? Is NBA not one of the most progressive league in the world?

The NBA is one of the most progressive leagues in the world, yes, for sure. It is still guided by those with money being in their best interests in a lot of the ways.

I'm not sure what your first question is asking.

The video cuts put the beginning of the quote calling republicans racists and saying they are the wolf. I don't think this video would be as popular if it included the full quote within this alt-right bubble.

Isn't that the whole point of the quote? People know who the racists from the right are. Everyone knows groups like white supremacists, KKK, and other radical groups are the wolves.

Not every Democrat is a fox, not by a long shot. Not every Republican is a wolf, not by a long shot.

Maybe you read into the video more than I did, but I got its point and didn't find it to be intellectually dishonest.