Thanks for looking it up. Not sure exactly what was concluded, but at least it's empirical data.
Yeah, its hard to really make any firm answer from it. Most HS players taken though were all physical monsters. A good deal of the bust also include big men who never gained skill. I do appear to be wrong for the most part though. I thought I remembered there being much more bust from the HS picking era. I guess if you are evaluating top tier talent, accurate assumptions can be made from the HS level, as long as it's just not off of physical dominance alone? Unless you are Dwight Howard that is.