What's new

Utes 2011 Football Discussion

I don't see anywhere on ESPN's site claiming USC is in first place. If there was a #1 by their name, that's one thing. They had to list them somewhere, but they don't count in the division standings.

Look at the PAC 12 standings on this ESPN page, they have ASU "ahead of" UCLA, in the same sense that they have USC "ahead of" everyone in the South:
https://espn.go.com/college-football/team/_/id/254/utah-utes

So again, Utah has the second best overall record in the PAC 12 South (only USC has a better overall record). They have a better overall record than UCLA, and blew them out head to head. If you are saying UCLA is ahead of Utah, you must be talking about the division standings, in which case USC doesn't count.

And yet if you follow your link, and click on the link to the "complete standings" it takes you to a page that shows you first the conference records, and then the overall records. It also lists UCLA above Arizona State, and still has USC in the standings. Utah is still fourth. There is not a 4 by their name because I believe ESPN expects the people that frequent their site to be able to count.

So again, the Conference record trumps the overall record if you are talking about CONFERENCE STANDINGS!!! USC still counts, they have only been disallowed from playing post season games. It does not mean they cannot "win the division". You are so dense when you want to be.

https://espn.go.com/college-football/conferences/standings/_/id/9/pacific-12-conference
 
Utah had covered the spread when the clock expired. Several hours later it was determined they had not covered the spread.

They changed the final score of the game hours after the game had ended? Yeah, okay. How does that change the outcome of the game again?
 
And yet if you follow your link, and click on the link to the "complete standings" it takes you to a page that shows you first the conference records, and then the overall records. It also lists UCLA above Arizona State, and still has USC in the standings. Utah is still fourth. There is not a 4 by their name because I believe ESPN expects the people that frequent their site to be able to count.

So again, the Conference record trumps the overall record if you are talking about CONFERENCE STANDINGS!!! USC still counts, they have only been disallowed from playing post season games. It does not mean they cannot "win the division". You are so dense when you want to be.
It absolutely does mean they can't win the division. On the front page of the PAC 12 official website right now there is a story talking about the division races. USC is not mentioned. Utah, ASU, and UCLA are who they talk about.
 
What does that have to do with standings or winning the game smart guy? Were we talking about gambling, or winning the game?
We're talking about the outcome of the game. The final score is absolutely the outcome. This was a big deal to gamblers.

Or we can go your way too and just talk about knowing who is going to win. In that case, we didn't know until after the final play. That's what I was talking about in the first place before your clock expiring = game determined posts.

So my original point stands, Utah lost that game on the final play, and won the BYU game long before the final play.
 
Oh, did I say they changed the outcome of the game? You sure? Link?

I said Utah lost on the last play.

They lost when they joined the PAC-12. Their facade of success will slowly wither and you're homerism will with it. Either that or you'll go into full blown delusional spin mode if you haven't already.
 
They lost when they joined the PAC-12. Their facade of success will slowly wither and you're homerism will with it. Either that or you'll go into full blown delusional spin mode if you haven't already.
Right, and that's why they are still alive in the division race with only 2 weeks left in a major injury plagued season.

Just the facts.
 
They lost when they joined the PAC-12. Their facade of success will slowly wither and you're homerism will with it. Either that or you'll go into full blown delusional spin mode if you haven't already.

I understand Spazz arguing about this, as he is the fan of a rival. You just come across as an ax-grinder, Hobo.

Besides, this conversation will be a lot more relevant after all the games have been played and the standings are final.
 
Back
Top