JazzyFresh
Banned
Many closely related viruses do indeed spread through the bats.
There are hundreds of corona viruses. Were they given SARS-COV2 before April 2020? I searched, but didn't find a link.
Again, I searched, but found no link.
Many closely related viruses do indeed spread through the bats.
There are hundreds of corona viruses. Were they given SARS-COV2 before April 2020? I searched, but didn't find a link.
Again, I searched, but found no link.
What have you inputted? Literally zip. Go away hypocrite.@One Brow
Why engage? They’re either trolling or someone whose POV on this you’ll never change because they’re either too politically corrupted, lack any logic or ability to rationalize, or are just flat out dumb as ****.
Most of the time, "engage" would be too strong a word.
He's a big boy if he wants to have a conversation he doesn't need some guy that adds nothing to the conversation but the need for attention. If it bothers you, grow up.Nevertheless, you’ve responded somewhere in the neighborhood of 100x in this thread to these idiots. Seems fruitless and frustrating.
Your best source is an article that refers to a scientist as "Batwoman" and is getting most of it's information from an anonymous twitter user with an axe to grind? Even then, it does not make a claim that the mice were given SARS-COV2 before 2020, nor that any scientists were hospitalized. Were you making that up out of thin air?
Dr. Fauci: “Senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about…”
The batwoman has been pretty well know for a loooooong time. You are insanely oblivious if you did not know about her.Your best source is an article that refers to a scientist as "Batwoman" and is getting most of it's information from an anonymous twitter user with an axe to grind? Even then, it does not make a claim that the mice were given SARS-COV2 before 2020, nor that any scientists were hospitalized. Were you making that up out of thin air?
So, to be clear, you failed to provide a source that the mice were given SARS-COV2 before 2020, nor that any scientists were hospitalized.The batwoman has been pretty well know for a loooooong time. You are insanely oblivious if you did not know about her.
Between 4:05 and 4:11 in that interview, Sen. Paul talks about obscuring responsibility for 4 billion people dying from a pandemic, and Dr. Fauci was responding to that statement. No strawman.Dr. Fauci is being incredibly dishonest here but you’ve got to admire the speed with which he constructed the strawman.
Was there another 4 million dead people Paul was talking about?Senator Paul didn’t say the NIH funded the creation of SARS-CoV-2.
Fauci did point out that the research went through several levels of review, all of which said it was not gain-of-function. If he would have been allowed to answer that question, without having 4 million dead thrown at him, we might have learned why, but Paul didn't really care about that. Do you have evidence that Fauci's claim of multiple levels of review is a lie, or that Paul understand this better than NIH scientists?Even if Fauci’s earlier statement of never funding gain-of-function research at the lab wasn’t a lie, at minimum it appears to be untrue.
Empty conspiracy theorizing.The NIH has still not fully explained ...
You sure you wanna go down this route? You already have shown how absolute little you know.So, to be clear, you failed to provide a source that the mice were given SARS-COV2 before 2020, nor that any scientists were hospitalized.
I am always interested in new and reliable information, so this is a win-win for me. You have them and I learn something, or you don't and I enjoy watching your continued empty bravado.You sure you wanna go down this route? You already have shown how absolute little you know.
This conversation is waaaaay to complex for you bro. Good act though.So many trolls in this thread. Sooo many. Ugh
It is kind of fun to watch someone get destroyed over and over again and keep trying. It almost makes me want to root for Jazzy, then he posts again...@One Brow
Why engage? They’re either trolling or someone whose POV on this you’ll never change because they’re either too politically corrupted, lack any logic or ability to rationalize, or are just flat out dumb as ****.
dude your a (something) with big pharms (something) ducktaped on your (something) u (something). Your the biggest hypocrite of all time . You have no purpose in this thread and you have dismantled with the greatest of ease.When you use a homosexual sexual act as an insult, you will be outed.
At any rate, you're pretty pathetic generally, so adding in homophobia doesn't really hurt your reputation all that much.