What's new

The Biden Administration and All Things Politics

I suspect he needed cooperation from all those people who said they would never get vaccinated. If they stick to their vow to never vaccinate, tough for him to “crush” Covid. I believe he should have known better, should have known that there was far too many stupid and selfish citizens, uninterested in helping their country, and who put themselves above the needs of their country. Probably needed ~95% vaccination rate to pull it off, just guessing. I have no idea what he could have said that would have dramatically increased vaccination rates. Esp. since ~60% of Republicans think Biden is an illegitimate president, which I would imagine makes it even less likely that they would listen to him at all, ever. I guess he was counting on the good will of the American people, but did not factor in all that absolutely inflexible ill will among the less intelligent.

Dude in the state of Victoria we're at that 95 % double vaxxed rate and opened up early december We're now getting 30-40,000 cases a day from a population of 6 million And we're in summer

Anyone who says they can "stop" a viral pandemic is a charlatan And those who profess loudly that this shouldn't be politicised seem to be the ones doing so most forcefully
 
Amazing the enthusiasm some have for Covid. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. They’re the same idiots who think Jan 6 was a great day
Couldn't agree with this one more. Spot on! The VENN diagram appears to be concentric circles between the would-be authoritarians who recently praised Dick Cheney in the course of their January 6 themed political rally for the least several weeks along with the media who sees dollar signs with the ratings the January 6 and COVID content is hauling in. They're totally the same idiots. Those doing the enthusiastic blah-blah-blah January 6, and those doing the enthusiastic blah-blah-blah COVID are the same people.
 
Dude in the state of Victoria we're at that 95 % double vaxxed rate and opened up early december We're now getting 30-40,000 cases a day from a population of 6 million And we're in summer

Anyone who says they can "stop" a viral pandemic is a charlatan And those who profess loudly that this shouldn't be politicised seem to be the ones doing so most forcefully
So, can I assume 95% boosters administered as well? Boosters seem to be important, and likely will continue to need them moving forward. Probably annual, at least, when it’s endemic. T cell vaccines would likely improve the situation as well, rendering longer lasting immunity.

 
Last edited:
and "I'm gonna shut down the virus"




Trump is an A grade loon but Joe's an A grade ****wit

You’re right. In hindsight, as the president, who normally might be expected to offer hope to his fellow citizens, it would have been better if he had said: “My fellow Americans. Fellow citizens. My friends. Things really don’t look too good at the moment. The truth is, I don’t believe it’s going to get better anytime soon. I could stand here and say we’re gonna beat this thing, and I’m going to get it done. But what would be the point? No species lasts forever, and it may be that the handwriting is on the wall. It’s that grim. Cherish your loved ones, my fellow Americans, and pray for our safe delivery”.
 
So, can I assume 95% boosters administered as well? Boosters seem to be important, and likely will continue to need them moving forward. Probably annual, at least, when it’s endemic. T cell vaccines would likely improve the situation as well, rendering longer lasting immunity.


no our booster rollout has only just recently started as we were prob the last in the world to roll out vaccinations. Yup you're right the T cell thing is hugely overlooked. So is general messaging about health which is so important in the outcomes. Even simple messaging about Vit D, C and zinc which are all shown to be important
 
You’re right. In hindsight, as the president, who normally might be expected to offer hope to his fellow citizens, it would have been better if he had said: “My fellow Americans. Fellow citizens. My friends. Things really don’t look too good at the moment. The truth is, I don’t believe it’s going to get better anytime soon. I could stand here and say we’re gonna beat this thing, and I’m going to get it done. But what would be the point? No species lasts forever, and it may be that the handwriting is on the wall. It’s that grim. Cherish your loved ones, my fellow Americans, and pray for our safe delivery”.

lol now you're just being facetious
 
You’re right. In hindsight, as the president, who normally might be expected to offer hope to his fellow citizens, it would have been better if he had said: “My fellow Americans. Fellow citizens. My friends. Things really don’t look too good at the moment. The truth is, I don’t believe it’s going to get better anytime soon. I could stand here and say we’re gonna beat this thing, and I’m going to get it done. But what would be the point? No species lasts forever, and it may be that the handwriting is on the wall. It’s that grim. Cherish your loved ones, my fellow Americans, and pray for our safe delivery”.
Red for President!

Sent from my SM-G986U using JazzFanz mobile app
 
It says a lot about your country that people believe that's the job of a president. Or even a presidential candidate.
Americans might need hope, but we want, and vote for, doom gloom and beating the other guy, the 'Merican way. Our motto should be "Give me victory or give the other guy death."
 
It says a lot about your country that people believe that's the job of a president. Or even a presidential candidate.
The President of the U.S. is in a national leadership position. Leaders often attempt to inspire and give hope.

I agree with you that the U.S. has a very skewed view of what a President is. Especially since we seem to be headed down a path of pushing celebrities into candidacy and considering their "performances" more than their relevant professional performance. The U.S. President is the national level administrator. That's the job. We should hire (elect) people with political administration skills. But we're electing people currently as ideological figure heads. They are not administrators, they are mouthpieces that echo what their voters want to hear. We are on a dangerous path.
 
The President of the U.S. is in a national leadership position. Leaders often attempt to inspire and give hope.

I agree with you that the U.S. has a very skewed view of what a President is. Especially since we seem to be headed down a path of pushing celebrities into candidacy and considering their "performances" more than their relevant professional performance. The U.S. President is the national level administrator. That's the job. We should hire (elect) people with political administration skills. But we're electing people currently as ideological figure heads. They are not administrators, they are mouthpieces that echo what their voters want to hear. We are on a dangerous path.
Often, we’re not even electing them because we like them. We’re electing people because they trigger the tribe we hate.
 
The President of the U.S. is in a national leadership position. Leaders often attempt to inspire and give hope.

The rise of populists and demagogues has led to a situation where if you're not promising that everything is going to be magical and amazing the moment you get elected--you're not going to get elected.

It's ridiculous. A president isn't supposed to offer you hope, they're supposed to offer you a sober, realistic look at things. Hope is nice but it doesn't do much for you in the long run.

I wish politicians had more cajones and people weren't looking to them to tell them fairy tales. We needed to be told this pandemic would last years. We needed to be told the vaccine would not magically fix everything. We needed to be told that some of our fellow humans are idiots and would refuse to get vaccinated no matter what.

We need to be told resources are finite. We need to be told that manufacturing jobs aren't coming back. We need to be told that both capitalism and democracy are in their end-stage.
 
It's ridiculous. A president isn't supposed to offer you hope, they're supposed to offer you a sober, realistic look at things. Hope is nice but it doesn't do much for you in the long run.
Democrats definitely learned their lesson in 1980, watching Jimmy Carter lose in an embarrassing fashion because he told the truth. Hell, he's the last president to have a serious primary challenger.
 
The rise of populists and demagogues has led to a situation where if you're not promising that everything is going to be magical and amazing the moment you get elected--you're not going to get elected.
It has been all downhill since 431 BC when Cleon of Athens hit the scene.

A president isn't supposed to offer you hope, they're supposed to offer you a sober, realistic look at things. Hope is nice but it doesn't do much for you in the long run.
With all due respect, I think you are confusing presidents with administrators. The former is supposed to lead. The people will take a leader who is strong and wrong over one who is weak and correct. It is administrators that are supposed to offer you a sober, realistic look at things. What makes or breaks a good President is the administrators he surrounds himself with.

We need to be told that both capitalism and democracy are in their end-stage.
Have fun with that. Even the authoritarians are now capitalists. So-called "communist" China has multiple stock exchanges. Capitalism isn't going away anytime soon.

stock-exchange-shenzhen.jpg
 
Last edited:
Capitalism will not go away or appreciably change as long as there are wealthy people capable of exploiting the system, and as long as money reigns supreme.
 
Top