prodigy
Well-Known Member
I bought the NFT Jazz Bear and now it's worth....*types digits into computer*...I actually owe Ryan Smith money.I wonder how much crypto he holds... he seems like a crypto bro for sure.
I bought the NFT Jazz Bear and now it's worth....*types digits into computer*...I actually owe Ryan Smith money.I wonder how much crypto he holds... he seems like a crypto bro for sure.
Then send me Thybulle back, and we trade Conley elsewhere.Philly is still looking to be a contender though, Mike Conley doesn't fit with Maxey/Harden there.
Yeah because it'd be weird to keep everyone, get off to a good start, then decide halfway through nvm.Right, it's unrealistic. I was just playing through scenarios in my head where scenario A is trading players now, getting worse value for them, but having a worse record netting us a better pick. Would that be better than scenario B, where you let guys increase their trade value and get better value from more desperate teams at the deadline. In the end your own pick is worse off.
The play in games gives more teams hope, which increases demand and decreases supply at the trade deadline. Specifically the type of players we have will be more in demand as win now pieces at the deadline. Like you said though, if we get off to a good start it makes it less likely we are going to want to be sellers at the deadline.
I don't think they'd move Tobias without getting Bojan back.Then send me Thybulle back, and we trade Conley elsewhere.
I think there are scenarios where we could be bad to start the season but Conley specifically is playing well and his value increases. Bogey/Royce are what they are trade value wise. JC likely ebbs and flows a little. Right now I'm not even sure Washington would do the Mike for KCP and stuff deal based on the murky pg market.Right, it's unrealistic. I was just playing through scenarios in my head where scenario A is trading players now, getting worse value for them, but having a worse record netting us a better pick. Would that be better than scenario B, where you let guys increase their trade value and get better value from more desperate teams at the deadline. In the end your own pick is worse off.
The play in games gives more teams hope, which increases demand and decreases supply at the trade deadline. Specifically the type of players we have will be more in demand as win now pieces at the deadline. Like you said though, if we get off to a good start it makes it less likely we are going to want to be sellers at the deadline.
I don't see any way that we land someone that moves the needle or is a significant upgrade for us while keeping Don/Rudy.tobias doesn't move the needle. if he's better than bogey, it's only marginal and he just isn't a difference maker.
The Pacers/Magic had contracts/players that were way easier to move.Basically the 2021 Magic/2022 Pacers model. Enter the season fake contending then tear it down half way thru the season.
Maybe being a cheap *** will actually be what saves the day. Who knew?Also some recent interviews with Andy Larsen or Eric Walden (can't remember who said) basically eluded to Smith being a broke boy after buying the team and the initial LT payments (hints why Utah wasn't willing to buy into the 2nd round). He might not really love the idea of tanking and looking like a failure, but it would ultimately save him money.
Going on past experience, that generally seems to be plan A...Plan C is run it back again lol