What's new
By:

Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz

SoberasHotRod said:
Oh, there is a ton out of Toronto that I would want. Especially after watching them play I'm convinced they are hoarding a ton of the players that everyone should want. Having that type of player doesn't work when it's all you have, but they could make other teams great. They just aren't balanced at all, and maybe some of their players aren't really learning how to play NBA basketball.
Click to expand...
I've watched them like 5 times recently and every time I am just like "what the hell even is this". Wouldn't surprise me if like Malachi Flynn went somewhere and was good because his new team is normal. I can't decide if it makes guys like Barnes or Siakham over/under or properly rated.
 
idiot said:
Can someone please explain what we see in McDaniels? By the stats test, he generally falls short of Vanderbilt (also more than a year older). Sure, he'll shoot more 3s, but he doesn't make them at a particularly good rate. Do we think he's the same caliber defender as his brother is?
Click to expand...
Good wing defender. Better shooter than Vando. He's a solid long wing who is also like 25.

Vando is not a good defender... he is just a high effort defender. Also there may be more to uncover in a better environment.
 
It seems like its always the guys in the "not worth a first, but worth more than a couple seconds" bucket are the hardest to trade. Its the reason Eric Gordon will always be a Rocket and Terrence Ross will always be on the Magic.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
I've watched them like 5 times recently and every time I am just like "what the hell even is this". Wouldn't surprise me if like Malachi Flynn went somewhere and was good because his new team is normal. I can't decide if it makes guys like Barnes or Siakham over/under or properly rated.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I don't think they are doing themselves any favors if they are trying to be sellers. On the other hand I can't see Ujiri giving anything up at a discount, so they might be pretty difficult to work with.
 
I've read A LOT or trade articles over the past 2 weeks or so..... and honestly, it all just feels like smoke. I would be more surprised if like a third of these 'trade rumors' happened than almost none at all.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
Good wing defender. Better shooter than Vando. He's a solid long wing who is also like 25.

Vando is not a good defender... he is just a high effort defender. Also there may be more to uncover in a better environment.
Click to expand...
He's always struck me as a guy that on a good team should be like 8th - 10th in the rotation, at best. Vando probably fits the same bill.

Unless you're pretty confident that you have a really high quality defender and/or that his shot will be better than it has been, it seems a little like shuffling the deck chairs to me. Gain a little shooting volume and maybe defense, lose a little rebounding and passing. I guess he does offer minutes down a position or a half as a potential wing defender.
 
Shad said:
I've read A LOT or trade articles over the past 2 weeks or so..... and honestly, it all just feels like smoke. I would be more surprised if like a third of these 'trade rumors' happened than almost none at all.
Click to expand...
Stuff will happen, but a lot of time what gets reported is the conversations that happened a while ago and are already dead.
 
Shad said:
I've read A LOT or trade articles over the past 2 weeks or so..... and honestly, it all just feels like smoke. I would be more surprised if like a third of these 'trade rumors' happened than almost none at all.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't be surprised to see a deal happen that comes completely out of left field, one that hasn't talked about or reported on at all.
 
"KO has gotta go" "KO has gotta go" "KO has gotta go"

We should have tried to sell high when he was really contributing at the first of the year.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top