We also need worthy high usage players with our hyper-efficient front court.Playmaking/feel is a concern for Cam, but I like that he doesn't take mid range shots.
We also need worthy high usage players with our hyper-efficient front court.Playmaking/feel is a concern for Cam, but I like that he doesn't take mid range shots.
I think both Bufkin and JHS are gone by 16. I think Cason is the most likely guard at 16 and if he's there at 16 it might be due to medicals.I can’t tell if OKC is sweet on Bilal or Bufkin… Bilal makes more sense but Bufkin was working with SGA in OKC and the Down to Dunk guys seem to have planted their flag on Kobe.
I think if you want Kobe you plan on getting him in front of OKC. I would support drafting him at 9 a lot more than JHS who is a meh choice at 16 imo.
It’s the worst shot in basketball unless you’re elite at it. Actually elite. He’s not elite at it and he’s not going to be elite at it.Because it's part of his game. He's a solid midrange shooter.
No Ceilings is a conglomerate of individuals. The two guys who do the film podcast (Corey and Andy?) have him at 9.
I think there is a lot to rebounding… similar to passing it requires reading what is going on all over the court and making fast decisions. Athleticism and size are obviously factors but also commitment to winning plays. Steals and high rebound rates are typically the most reliable statistical markers.Saw someone mention that with Podz. It makes sense to me. 1) Rebounding reflects some degree of functional athleticism + hustle + intelligence 2) rebounding is just overrated in general for defense. Many times a player is a net positive/negative on defense just on the basis of rebounding.
Who are shooting those shots at any significant rate that aren’t 1st or 2nd options?I think being a midrange hater is dated. The midrange game is back and it's hyper important to have guys who can get and hit those shots in the playoffs.
.
I think rebounding is just a good indicator for how engaged you are. Sometimes they can be kind of inflated in a Westbrooky sense where your team is letting you get those X amount of uncontested rebounds per game so you can lead breaks, but that still takes a high level of engagement.I think there is a lot to rebounding… similar to passing it requires reading what is going on all over the court and making fast decisions. Athleticism and size are obviously factors but also commitment to winning plays. Steals and high rebound rates are typically the most reliable statistical markers.
I think there is a decent chance the guy we draft this year could be that guy for us. It's a skill I would like to have on the team and is worth developing and not ignoring like the Quin era did.Who are shooting those shots at any significant rate that aren’t 1st or 2nd options?
You’re doing the Teflon thing again.
Probably. There's just 100x the amount of draft content now compared to back then. Back then it was like DX and Chad Ford and not much else.Is this the longest draft thread? Does it pass Exum, Kanter, or Haywood years? I'm pretty sure those were the most hyped for us before this. Also where's @colton 's compilation draft threads?
Then that’s a shot a prospect should work on once they’ve bagged their more NBA-relevant/fundamental shot like the 3.I think there is a decent chance the guy we draft this year could be that guy for us. It's a skill I would like to have on the team and is worth developing and not ignoring like the Quin era did