So lose two good players for no shot at Reaves?We can still throw the max at him if THT and Clarkson opt out...
So lose two good players for no shot at Reaves?We can still throw the max at him if THT and Clarkson opt out...
I mean... if they've decided to opt out, we might lose them anyways... I guess it would depend on what indication they give to the FO when they opt out and if they have any interest in re-signing or would rather pursue contracts elsewhere... and of course it would depend on whether the FO wants to offer them new contracts at the pricepoints they are looking to get.So lose two good players for no shot at Reaves?
Maybe, I'm not 100% sold on him, to be honest. But in any case I think LAL will match whatever, so I'm thinking let Rockets do the offer sheet job.For a proven starting point guard in this league? I think that’s reasonable.
I would be shocked if THT opted out. Nothing suggests he doesnt like it here and that new CBA puts a squeeze on the mid tier players who hit FA. They wont be able to use FA to cash in like they used to since there is much less money and competition for those guys. Lots of guys who used to hit FA will now rather ask sign and trade deals if they are not getting extension offers, which is a win-win situation for the team and the player.I mean... if they've decided to opt out, we might lose them anyways... I guess it would depend on what indication they give to the FO when they opt out and if they have any interest in re-signing or would rather pursue contracts elsewhere... and of course it would depend on whether the FO wants to offer them new contracts at the pricepoints they are looking to get.
Of all the things in your arsenal to apologize and you choose this?I want to personally apologize to everyone for this thread of false hope
Also, if we offered 4/88 (not sure we have the room for that but play along), the Lakers have how long to match it? A week?
Would the Lakers match that?Lakers match that instantly but they only have 24 hours to do so.
The max we can offer is 4/98M. We would only need about 25M in cap space to do that.
Would the Lakers match that?