I would be shocked if Utah did a deal like that for Sexton, but if you're getting Lillard in then yeah, you probably want to get off Sexton and you might have limited options
Allen/Pat and a second for Collin is kinda dumb… I guess if we are just looking for a deal to get off his money… I don’t get it.
Ok… that would make more sense.We aren’t doing that. It’s one of their premium firsts or bust.
Haha yeah, that’s just trading to trade because you’re bored over the summer.We aren’t doing that. It’s one of their premium firsts or bust.
Suck our collective Grady.fine don't ever respond to my wisdom, you ignorant bitches can eat my ***
Haha yeah, that’s just trading to trade because you’re bored over the summer.
FOH with that.
If we’re getting Lillard, Sexton almost has to be included in the deal somewhere. Especially since we’re using up the rest of our cap space to extend JC.I would be shocked if Utah did a deal like that for Sexton, but if you're getting Lillard in then yeah, you probably want to get off Sexton and you might have limited options
Such horrible value… does DA need one Bojan-like trade every year?OWord is Milwaukee has offered Allen/Connaughton/2nd for Sexton but Utah is holding out for their 2028 1st. Dame deal is holding things up at the moment.
Why don’t we just include it in a Dame deal?
UTAH in: Damian Lillard
UTAH out: Sexton/THT/KO + 3 firsts
POR in: THT/KO/Allen/Connaughton + 4 firsts
POR out: Damian Lillard
MKE in: Collin Sexton
MKE out: Allen/Connaughton + first
unless it’s JC on the moveIf we’re getting Lillard, Sexton almost has to be included in the deal somewhere. Especially since we’re using up the rest of our cap space to extend JC.
If it’s JC on the move, then we’re better off keeping Sexton as a 6th man and looking at a better consolidating deal with him down the road than getting parts and pieces now.Such horrible value… does DA need one Bojan-like trade every year?
unless it’s JC on the move