What's new
By:
Filters

The West Conundrum

HermanG

HermanG

Well-Known Member
Can all these things be simultaneously true?
  • Spurs improve their record after adding Wemby
  • Rockets improve after adding FVV+Brooks+Amen+Cam
  • Jazz improve after adding Collins, Keyonte, Hendricks and Sensabaugh (and also by not tanking the rest of the way next season)
  • OKC improve after adding Chet and Wallace
  • Lakers improve after all their applauded offseason moves
  • Suns improve after adding Beal (plus Durant wasnt there full year)
  • Nuggets stay as class of the conference
Thats 7 of the 15 teams in the West who are very realistically expected to improve or hold their record. The only one we really expect to fall right now are Blazers, but they already finished bottom 3 in the West last year so its not like they can "make much room" for those on the rise.

Even if you dismiss 1 or 2 from that list being true it still raises this question:
Where does that leave the other teams... Grizzlies, Kings, Clippers, Warriors, Wolves, Pels and Mavs?

All those teams have expectations attached to them, and apart from maybe Grizzlies and Kings the rest of them have some major future concerns going forward if they fall to make way for the teams on the rise. So the question is:
Who or what gives in?
 
Just about every year there is one young team that breaks through in to the top 4. I'm going to guess that team is OKC this year. There is always one old team that slips, not sure who that will be this year.
 
ONE LOVE said:
I think we’ll be bad 1 more year.

We have a lot of new & young talent who aren’t quite ripe yet.
Click to expand...
Do you think our record will be worse than last year? If not, then it doesnt change the situation.

There are still teams bound to fall, some might actually fall very hard if they bleed wins against all the rising teams.
 
fishonjazz said:
I say even though spurs and rockets improve, they still suck.
Click to expand...
Yet you think they improve, which will take wins away from somewhere. Where do you think those wins come from?

Their projected win totals are lowest in the West atm (tbf Blazers line is not set).. but they are up 8.5 and 9.5 wins from their finishing records last year.

Thats a lot of wins off the books from other teams.
 
Also it might be mind of a stretch to say we improved cuz we drafted a bunch of rookies and added a player who has gotten worse every year.

What's better to have for immediate wins: Malik Beasley, Jared Vanderbilt, and Mike Conley or who we just added?

If the Jazz got better it's primarily because of internal improvement (Lauri making another leap, big 2nd year from Walker, THT being consistent , Sexton staying healthy, Fonteccio getting comfortable, Ochai growing into his role) or Collins really improving outside of Atlanta.
 
HermanG said:
Do you think our record will be worse than last year? If not, then it doesnt change the situation.

There are still teams bound to fall, some might actually fall very hard if they bleed wins against all the rising teams.
Click to expand...
Yes i think it will be worse.. pretty unlikely we’ll replicate last year’s hot start with all the young guys.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Also it might be mind of a stretch to say we improved cuz we drafted a bunch of rookies and added a player who has gotten worse every year.

What's better to have for immediate wins: Malik Beasley, Jared Vanderbilt, and Mike Conley or who we just added?

If the Jazz got better it's primarily because of internal improvement (Lauri making another leap, big 2nd year from Walker, THT being consistent , Sexton staying healthy, Fonteccio getting comfortable, Ochai growing into his role) or Collins really improving outside of Atlanta.
Click to expand...
I think the jazz got better by not tanking. Sitting healthy players and trying to get worse via trades wont happen this next season imo. That and internal improvement (Hardy more comfortable and the team being more comfortable with the system and each other) is why we should be better imo. Not necessarily because we have a more talented roster.
 
If everyone has better talent then everyone wins, right?

No, talent alone won't do it. Elite talent maybe, but I don't think even Wemby will dominate anymore. It's talent + experience + coaching + organizational strengths that will win.
 
whatthe said:
If everyone has better talent then everyone wins, right?

No, talent alone won't do it. Elite talent maybe, but I don't think even Wemby will dominate anymore. It's talent + experience + coaching + organizational strengths that will win.
Click to expand...
Yup, comes down to chemistry and health. How quickly you can start out the gate.

I dont buy the "we wont tank again" thing as a being a big deal. I think a lot of the NBA wont tank (at least not as hard) this year. For instance, I dont think Houston is going to sit FVV and Brooks after giving them huge bags.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Yup, comes down to chemistry and health. How quickly you can start out the gate.

I dont buy the "we wont tank again" thing as a being a big deal. I think a lot of the NBA wont tank (at least not as hard) this year. For instance, I dont think Houston is going to sit FVV and Brooks after giving them huge bags.
Click to expand...
Yeah the draft class of 2024 doesnt inspire much tanking based on early assessments... which makes the West situation even more interesting.

The geriatric teams (Warriors, Clippers and Lakers) current iterations are drawing their last breaths anyways within the next few years, but next year thry are still in the tryhards category along with 11 others.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Also it might be mind of a stretch to say we improved cuz we drafted a bunch of rookies and added a player who has gotten worse every year.

What's better to have for immediate wins: Malik Beasley, Jared Vanderbilt, and Mike Conley or who we just added?

If the Jazz got better it's primarily because of internal improvement (Lauri making another leap, big 2nd year from Walker, THT being consistent , Sexton staying healthy, Fonteccio getting comfortable, Ochai growing into his role) or Collins really improving outside of Atlanta.
Click to expand...
Lets not forget last years team was put together with duct tape less than 2 months before season began.

Kessler playing 30MPG on the same level he averaged per 36 and Lauri being the "first option" version of himself with nearly 30/9 stats alone are massive upgrades from where we started last year.

Not to mention Hardy was learning on the job and players were learning his system on the go.

Lots of reasons to believe we are much better now than 12 months ago, even without accounting for Collins or the rookies.
 
HermanG said:
Lets not forget last years team was put together with duct tape less than 2 months before season began.

Kessler playing 30MPG on the same level he averaged per 36 and Lauri being the "first option" version of himself with nearly 30/9 stats alone are massive upgrades from where we started last year.

Not to mention Hardy was learning on the job and players were learning his system on the go.

Lots of reasons to believe we are much better now than 12 months ago, even without accounting for Collins or the rookies.
Click to expand...
Brother read what you quoted.
 
HermanG said:
??

Oh I see... Because I didnt contradict or argue anything in your post you felt that was a broken reply.

You know its possible to reply without contradicting. It even has a name... its called "a conversation". Nice skill, highly recommend learning it.
Click to expand...
A conversation usually involves responding to what the person said, not repeating exactly what I said.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top