What's new

John Oliver facing 15 years in prison for attempting to bribe Supreme Court Justice

Al-O-Meter

Well-Known Member
I don't think anything will come of it as John Oliver is loved by the left and the DOJ is only weaponized against the political right, but he clearly did attempt to bribe a Supreme Court Justice on tape.

 
I don't think anything will come of it as John Oliver is loved by the left and the DOJ is only weaponized against the political right, but he clearly did attempt to bribe a Supreme Court Justice on tape.

That's not a bribe. That is a job offer
 
I don't think anything will come of it as John Oliver is loved by the left and the DOJ is only weaponized against the political right, but he clearly did attempt to bribe a Supreme Court Justice on tape.

A bribe would be offering the money in exchange for a favorable ruling.
 
I don't think anything will come of it as John Oliver is loved by the left and the DOJ is only weaponized against the political right, but he clearly did attempt to bribe a Supreme Court Justice on tape.

I thought he already was getting trips and gifts and whatnot from those on the right. Since the DOJ is weaponized against the political right, clearly prosecutions will be forthcoming for those bribes
 
I thought he already was getting trips and gifts and whatnot from those on the right. Since the DOJ is weaponized against the political right, clearly prosecutions will be forthcoming for those bribes
The difference between those gifts from billionaire friends and John Oliver's offer is the quid pro quo on tape. John Oliver spelled out explicitly how much he was willing to pay and exactly what official act he wanted in exchange for the payment.
 
The difference between those gifts from billionaire friends and John Oliver's offer is the quid pro quo on tape. John Oliver spelled out explicitly how much he was willing to pay and exactly what official act he wanted in exchange for the payment.
I'm not sure retiring counts as an official act. Either way, nothing will come from this.
 
The difference between those gifts from billionaire friends and John Oliver's offer is the quid pro quo on tape. John Oliver spelled out explicitly how much he was willing to pay and exactly what official act he wanted in exchange for the payment.
Oh those billionaires had quid pro quo as well.
Being on tape or not shouldn't matter in your fictional world of weaponized justice system. Or are you saying that the weaponized justice system would require proof and evidence to prosecute those on the political right? Doesn't really jibe

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Nice try, but no. 18 U.S. Code § 201 is not limited to favorable rulings.

(3) the term “official act” means any decision or action on any question, matter, cause, suit, proceeding or controversy, which may at any time be pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in such official’s official capacity, or in such official’s place of trust or profit.

Favorable rulings and stays of execution of other judicial findings are the only official acts Thomas can perform. Resigning is not an official act.
 
Back
Top