I'm bored = two trade ideas that won't happen
- Thread starter NAOS
- Start date
Also, stop plagiarizing my idea, relative!
(Jimmy Butler)
I'm quietly-ish holding out hope. I think it makes a lot of sense for both teams (even though the Bulls would have to send out a little more salary [is Keith Bogans still on the team???])
(Jimmy Butler)
I'm quietly-ish holding out hope. I think it makes a lot of sense for both teams (even though the Bulls would have to send out a little more salary [is Keith Bogans still on the team???])
NAOS
Well-Known Member
holy shiiii, dude. I promise I didn't see this post. Good idea, chap!
NotDeadYet
Well-Known Member
Here's a gutsy trade that likely will never happen. I think this would actually help the Jazz overall, but I doubt Golden State would bite.
I'd be willing to trade CJ, who is very recently coming into his own as a SG, for Golden State's SF Dorell Wright, who also is having a very good year. Not only would we gain a young legit NBA SF, we could then move Hayward back to SG where he clearly is way more comfortable playing.
I'd be willing to trade CJ, who is very recently coming into his own as a SG, for Golden State's SF Dorell Wright, who also is having a very good year. Not only would we gain a young legit NBA SF, we could then move Hayward back to SG where he clearly is way more comfortable playing.
This and that.
Are we assuming Butler is good because he is from Marquette and has a good story?
orangello
Well-Known Member
Yes. Not to mention the Wesley Matthews Factor.
We are assuming Butler will be at least AS good as Josh Howard in 5 years (Howard will be out of the league, and certainly not on the Jazz) and could be pretty good since he's, you know, a rookie.
If he's really impressing, he won't be available. He's a rookie SF with a good body and a better brain.
This Josh Howard acquisition will be nothing besides throwing $3 million away unless they make a lot of noise in the playoffs or trade him for something else to develop. Hell, even if they make a lot of noise in the playoffs, how much of that has to do with him, and how could that make the Jazz (without him, because he will not be on the team after this year) better in the longterm?
I just don't think stacking the team with rookies is a good idea. I tend to think veteran "leadership" gets blown out of proportion, but you don't want your whole team to be 1st and 2nd year players.