Kamala Harris for Pres

[Safetydan]

Honest question to all the people who will be voting for Kamala:

Why do you plan to vote for Kamala without mentioning Trump, gender or race?

I don't think anybody here is voting for anybody based off their gender or race. But, as for not mentioning trump, the fact is the choice is inherently a relative one. For me, Kamala is far closer to my worldview and values than Donald Trump. I don't think I can take the alternative choice out of the equation. If it was Kamala and somebody who was closer to me than her I would choose the other somebody. Kamala is still quite a distance from my ideal.

 

[LogGrad98]

I don't think anybody here is voting for anybody based off their gender or race. But, as for not mentioning trump, the fact is the choice is inherently a relative one. For me, Kamala is far closer to my worldview and values than Donald Trump. I don't think I can take the alternative choice out of the equation. If it was Kamala and somebody who was closer to me than her I would choose the other somebody. Kamala is still quite a distance from my ideal.

Exactly, well-said. Just the point I was making, but with less snark, so you get fewer points. 83 out of 100. Thanks for playing.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Don’t disagree with that at all. I’m just responding why she would get more independents than Kamala.

Are you voting for Kamala for her political accomplishments or experience?

Brother people are voting against the other person, as is the case for most people who vote for any presidential candidate. This isnt a unique phenomena for Kamala. Trump wouldnt get elected if there wasnt a large number of Republicans voting simply because he's not a democrat.

If people could only vote for people they actually genuinely liked, no one would get elected to any position because nearly every politician polls below 50% approval in the internet era where we can actually see how full of **** these people are across the board.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Don’t disagree with that at all. I’m just responding why she would get more independents than Kamala.

Are you voting for Kamala for her political accomplishments or experience?

Dont independents value themselves as free thinkers who are smarter than party loyalist? It makes zero sense why Independents would favor a candidate with no experience or track record of voting.

 

[Ron Mexico]

Honest question to all the people who will be voting for Kamala:

Why do you plan to vote for Kamala without mentioning Trump, gender or race?

She is fairly experienced. She is highly educated and smart. She's fierce and fights for what she thinks is good. Like for women's rights being the first vice president to visit an abortion clinic. I like a lot of her suggested platform. Stricter gun laws, looser weed laws, not supporting/funding genocide, support for LGBT, and support for minorities. I like that she's young and still competent. I like that she has good relations with foreign governments, and probably the main one she was a big part of key decision making with Biden that led to a very successful USA the last 4 years. It would be great to keep things going great like they have with a younger, sharper President.

What don't you like about her?

 

[Hearsky]

Do not underestimate crypto's role in this election. The potential swing could be the determining factor.

 

[Bucknutz]

Again:

Why the **** do we need a better reason than to keep an admitted Nazi out of the white house? Please defend Trump as a viable presidential candidate without mentioning any conspiracy theories such as trumped up charges, hand-picked judges, corrupt juries, etc.

You do that and we will consider dropping Trump as a "reason" for voting against the man that fomented the ONLY direct domestic attack on our democracy in the history of the country outside of the civil war.

Not voting for Trump, already stated.

1. Trump is not a Nazi, and calling him one waters down the real definition of a Nazi from 80 years ago.

2. Most of the posters here and any never Trumper’s will downplay most of his achievements:
1. Tax rates that benefits both individuals and companies
2. Reformed the criminal justice system
3. Take down of ISIS
4. Operations Warpspeed
5. Border crossings
6. Dropping prices of prescription drugs - executive orders
7. Middle East peace
Just to name a few…

3. Trump got to pick the judges because the Democrats put out a terrible candidate with no personality. They are putting out another terrible candidate with even less personality, less experience and almost no accomplishments other than her time as DA.

I’m not going to vote for him, but Kamala is the worst option the left could have pushed.

Why RFK over Kamala for me?
1. Genuine
2. Depth of issues
3. Can actually speak and have an off the script conversation
4. Understands what it takes to work with both parties.
5. Not in a tribe.

Easy choice with reasons.

Listening to One speech for many, just changes their opinion overnight and now are fully on board with a terrible candidate. Forget everything else.

 

[Bucknutz]

Dont independents value themselves as free thinkers who are smarter than party loyalist? It makes zero sense why Independents would favor a candidate with no experience or track record of voting.

That’s right, seems like most people here are party loyalists. Both parties Defend terrible candidates. You’re right, Kamala doesn’t have any experience and if you had 2 candidates with no experience, most people would select the person who relates with them more and Kamala would not be the choice of independents.

 

[LogGrad98]

Not voting for Trump, already stated.

1. Trump is not a Nazi, and calling him one waters down the real definition of a Nazi from 80 years ago.

2. Most of the posters here and any never Trumper’s will downplay most of his achievements:
1. Tax rates that benefits both individuals and companies
2. Reformed the criminal justice system
3. Take down of ISIS
4. Operations Warpspeed
5. Border crossings
6. Dropping prices of prescription drugs - executive orders
7. Middle East peace
Just to name a few…

3. Trump got to pick the judges because the Democrats put out a terrible candidate with no personality. They are putting out another terrible candidate with even less personality, less experience and almost no accomplishments other than her time as DA.

I’m not going to vote for him, but Kamala is the worst option the left could have pushed.

Why RFK over Kamala for me?
1. Genuine
2. Depth of issues
3. Can actually speak and have an off the script conversation
4. Understands what it takes to work with both parties.
5. Not in a tribe.

Easy choice with reasons.

Listening to One speech for many, just changes their opinion overnight and now are fully on board with a terrible candidate. Forget everything else.

Most of your top 7 points are republican talking points that don't stand up to scrutiny. The tax cuts, for example, did more to increase our debt than any other president, as the lion's share of the money given back went to large corporations and wealthy individuals, with nominal impact on the middle class and no to border-negative impact on true low-income households. See context matters. Sound bites don't cut it.

And if he isn't a nazi what is with his nazi language in full use on the right?

As far as middle east peace, sure looks like smoke and mirrors to me.

Trump's Mideast deals tout 'peace' where there was never war

JERUSALEM (AP) — For the first time in more than a quarter-century, a U.S. president will host a signing ceremony between Israelis and Arabs at the White House, billing it as an "historic breakthrough" in a region long known for its stubborn conflicts.

apnews.com

We can obviously go at this all day, so I will suffice to say, good thing you are not voting for an active domestic terrorist for president. Glad you have reasoned it out, and are skipping over his numerous (onerous and highly questionable) "accomplishments" to place a sane vote.

Of course you do pick the one guy with a brain worm.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

That’s right, seems like most people here are party loyalists. Both parties Defend terrible candidates. You’re right, Kamala doesn’t have any experience and if you had 2 candidates with no experience, most people would select the person who relates with them more and Kamala would not be the choice of independents.

I mean, one can assume you are either a racist, sexistt, or just a complete dumbass (or some combo) if you dont recognize that Kamala Harris has political experience.

 

[Bucknutz]

She is fairly experienced. She is highly educated and smart. She's fierce and fights for what she thinks is good. Like for women's rights being the first vice president to visit an abortion clinic. I like a lot of her suggested platform. Stricter gun laws, looser weed laws, not supporting/funding genocide, support for LGBT, and support for minorities. I like that she's young and still competent. I like that she has good relations with foreign governments, and probably the main one she was a big part of key decision making with Biden that led to a very successful USA the last 4 years. It would be great to keep things going great like they have with a younger, sharper President.

What don't you like about her?

The opportunity that the Democrats have right now, to select the best option for President, is so damn important and they go with the worst option.

I don’t like her because she has no accomplishments, limited experience, has no depth on almost any topic, is completely fake with no real personality. You want to beat Trump and you have better options, yet choose Kamala.

With that being said, I do appreciate your response and completely respect it. I’m honestly happy that you have reasoning behind your support. Thank you for answering!

 

[Bucknutz]

I mean, one can assume you are either a racist, sexistt, or just a complete dumbass (or some combo) if you dont recognize that Kamala Harris has political experience.

Just as much as Vance, like I said yesterday…