What's new

ESPN Bet Sets Jazz O/U at 28.5

And don't you think that most people behave by betting using a current roster rather than an unknown roster that is less likely (quite unlikely in this case) to be the roster of the team they are betting on?

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
If I knew how to accurately predict motifs and behaviour of human beings I would probably be in the business myself.

FWiW, I think average $5 Joe either goes by gut feeling or looks at our last season record +- moves made in the offseason.

The big players probably go much deeper analyzing the direction of the organization and likely bet on us tanking (and thus making tanking moves to degrade our roster).
 
If I knew how to accurately predict motifs and behaviour of human beings I would probably be in the business myself.

FWiW, I think average $5 Joe either goes by gut feeling or looks at our last season record +- moves made in the offseason.

The big players probably go much deeper analyzing the direction of the organization and likely bet on us tanking (and thus making tanking moves to degrade our roster).

You don't think those big players who go deeper and analyze things look at the fact that Lauri can get way more money by staying with the jazz, ainge is asking for the world in any trade, and the warriors are the only bidder who are bidding on a dude under contract for one season and come to the conclusion that Lauri won't be traded like the rest of us have?

Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk
 
You don't think those big players who go deeper and analyze things look at the fact that Lauri can get way more money by staying with the jazz, ainge is asking for the world in any trade, and the warriors are the only bidder who are bidding on a dude under contract for one season and come to the conclusion that Lauri won't be traded like the rest of us have?

Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk
The fact that you have to argue this subject and that opinions here are divided serves as perfect evidence that the line should not reflect the team as is, but has some possible scenarios baked into it.. most of them being subtractive type.
 
True, but people forget how poorly we started the season last year. The majority of our wins happened during an ok December then a really hot January.

I could see this team having a good month or so and ruining the tank.
Or like Lauri improves. Sexton improves and gets more consistent starter level minutes. Clarkson plays less and improves. They don't play Collins/Walker together at all. Keyonte takes a big step forward (very possible). Hendricks takes a minor step forward. Walker gets wildly more consistent with the little things.

The idea that the Jazz will be guaranteed bad (or the level of bad that will guarantee bottom 5) just doesn't seem to be the case when they have so many guys who should get better.

If Lauri is kept you kind of have to trade Sexton to have a shot at a bottom 5 record
 
Yeah, Cody Williams is a rookie and could play a lot of minutes, but Cody Williams doesn't strike me as the kind of rookie who is going to go out there and be awful.

If you play Collier/Filipowski a ton that might do the trick as they both have some glaring weaknesses that NBA teams will expose as rookies until they share them up
 
Or like Lauri improves. Sexton improves and gets more consistent starter level minutes. Clarkson plays less and improves. They don't play Collins/Walker together at all. Keyonte takes a big step forward (very possible). Hendricks takes a minor step forward. Walker gets wildly more consistent with the little things.

The idea that the Jazz will be guaranteed bad (or the level of bad that will guarantee bottom 5) just doesn't seem to be the case when they have so many guys who should get better.

If Lauri is kept you kind of have to trade Sexton to have a shot at a bottom 5 record

When both Lauri and Kessler play it feels like our offense and defense has a shot to be good enough to win games.

The unknown is how far Hardy is willing to help the tank out. The FO will want him to prioritize, "development" over wins. Normally I would say no coach is going to jeopardize wins, but Hardy definitely got a little grimey at the end of the season.
 
The fact that you have to argue this subject and that opinions here are divided serves as perfect evidence that the line should not reflect the team as is, but has some possible scenarios baked into it.. most of them being subtractive type.
Again, we will find out in a few weeks


Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
The fact that you have to argue this subject and that opinions here are divided serves as perfect evidence that the line should not reflect the team as is, but has some possible scenarios baked into it.. most of them being subtractive type.
Fish is a brick wall, don't attempt
 
Fish is a brick wall, don't attempt
Nah. We all agree that the betters are what set the line. I just think that the betters are smart and like to win. I think the betters believe that Lauri sticks with the jazz this season just like all the experts think as well and they are betting accordingly and I think that we will see the line remain mostly the same as it currently is when Lauri extends with the jazz and isn't eligible for trade.

I don't know why you think that take is outlandish. What is unreasonable about it?

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Yeah, Cody Williams is a rookie and could play a lot of minutes, but Cody Williams doesn't strike me as the kind of rookie who is going to go out there and be awful.

If you play Collier/Filipowski a ton that might do the trick as they both have some glaring weaknesses that NBA teams will expose as rookies until they share them up
I think Cody and Taylor can kinda blend in so that they don't hurt you and have things they can chip in here and there. Collier/Flip/Brice are going to have more potential to hurt us on court.
 
Nah. We all agree that the betters are what set the line. I just think that the betters are smart and like to win. I think the betters believe that Lauri sticks with the jazz this season just like all the experts think as well and they are betting accordingly and I think that we will see the line remain mostly the same as it currently is when Lauri extends with the jazz and isn't eligible for trade.

I don't know why you think that take is outlandish. What is unreasonable about it?

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Hypothetical here, but if the messaging was different and if it seemed like there was a decent chance to people, including those that set the betting lines, that Lauri was going to be traded, do you think the line would have been set differently?
 
Back
Top