This a is a supreme cope. You simply do not know if it's true and you are putting a theory that cannot be falsified. The same is true for "traceable contracts". The only reason why you reverted to that is because you cannot find any other (even remotely) plausible reason why the Jazz signed Eubanks and Svi and just inventing reasons on the fly relying on pure conjecture and the blind faith in the wisdom of the Jazz.I think it’s as simple as they’re two solid vets with experience and work ethic that won’t require them playing a ton of minutes. You get that commitment, effort, example and hustle in practice, but don’t have to necessarily reward them with the playing time. Not sure that Samanic, Bazley, Yurt7 or Lofton actually bring that to the table. Plus, it gives you another $8 million or so in traceable contracts to maneuver with at the deadline.
Eubanks and Svi are career average backups without any upside. It made sense for Boston and Phoenix to have them during the last season: they were both contenders who sunk the bulk of their payroll in a few stars and did not have any young players. It made zero sense for the Jazz - a bad team with tons of young projects - to sign them.
Last edited: