What's new

Trump Dictatorship and All Things Politics

I personally don't want the country to go to hell even when trump wins an election
I love America and hope the government does a great job while trump is in office and things are wonderful.
But then we’re just postponing the consequences. Voters need to feel what they voted for. The current situation is untenable. One party gets to perform a circle jerk every few days of anger and extremism that goes unchecked. They promise things like mass
Deportations, tariffs, and running the government like a business. Stupid and bored people fall for this nonsense and empower this party. The party continues to radicalize its adherents with more and more extreme rhetoric.

It’s time to put that rhetoric into practice or else admit that they’re merely passing gas on Fox News.

Democrats should stop shielding voters from the consequences of their voting. Vote for an *** clown? Don’t shield them from being **** on. It’s the only way for them to learn!
 
Voters need to feel what they voted for.
Thats just it though. They either will or they wont. Government will do a good or bad job while trump is president. Our country will get better or worse.
I hope that I have been wrong all along. I hope the Government kicks butt over the next 4 years and our country gets better. I would rather be wrong and happy than right and miserable. I will always root for every single administration and for our country to succeed. We are just going to have to agree to disagree here.

I for one hope the (negative) consequences are postponed forever and instead there are hella positive consequences.

I think trump will make things worse but I would love to be wrong.
 
I think it was you explaining to all of us just earlier today that Trump is not currently the President.

So in that instance Trump not being in office was the primary issue, but in this the primary issue is what Trump hopes to do some day once he becomes President.

Trump is not doing anything right now, correct? He has no influence and can be assigned no blame?

Just try to be consistent.
 
So in that instance Trump not being in office was the primary issue, but in this the primary issue is what Trump hopes to do some day once he becomes President.
In this instance, Trump not currently being President is so low on the list of it not being a primary issue as to be inconsequential. The order made by Trump to have schools teach his alternate history is imaginary. The textbooks supposed to be the source of such instruction are imaginary. The Presidential order to author such textbooks is imaginary. Red is employing imaginary events, that aren't even plausible, as evidence for the reality of his fever dream.

I love that at least a few times now you have walked right into it when I set you up like that.
It is my intention to bring positivity into the world and it makes me happy to hear my content brings you joy.
 

Meanwhile, it’s possible you may have missed the boat entirely…..

THE WORD FOR THIS IS OLIGARCHY, AND OLIGARCHS DON’T THINK OF THE COUNTRY FIRST:


“Almost four years to the day, we’re back here again. But this time, Trump is a side player in the show. He and his transition team reportedly had no problem with the 2024 version of a year-end spending bill until this week. Then Elon Musk starting posting into a frenzy about how a perfectly normal bipartisan agreement represented a total betrayal, lying about the contents in the process. Trump had to be roused to back up his co-president, getting House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) to construct a partisan solution while inserting an eleventh-hour, two-year suspension of the debt limit to prevent the Republican trifecta from having to deal with that nuisance in the next Congress…..

That brings us back to the initial reason for the blowup: Elon’s endless scroll. Which appears to be tied to none of the inaccurate reasons he offered on X, but an old standby for billionaires: personal financial and business incentives. The original bill would have made it harder for Musk to build Tesla factories in Shanghai.

Congress has been working itself into a lather about China for years now, and they finally came up with a way to deal with this issue. Sens. John Cornyn (R-TX) and Bob Casey (D-PA) have the flagship bill, which would either prohibit U.S. companies from investing in “sensitive technologies” in China, including semiconductors and artificial intelligence, or set up a broad notification regime around it.

The bill would add some reporting requirements and enhanced reviews as well; in general, it expands restrictions that the Treasury Department has already put forward in regulatory rules. Codifying those rules into statute means that they cannot be changed by successive administrations.

You can argue about whether the U.S. should be restricting investment in China. But it’s incontrovertible that a billionaire who has a bunch of investments in China and wants to make more all of a sudden disrupted a normal congressional process that was going to restrict that investment with a bunch of lies from his media platform. And lo and behold, when the new funding bill emerged, the outbound investment feature was dropped. In fact, all traces of provisions related to China were removed from the bill.

(Red: See what America’s, and the planet’s, richest oligarch did? He took care of himself.):

So Donald Trump, alleged leader of the realignment of populist Republicans, scuttled a spending bill primarily to shield the richest man in the world’s investments in China and the profits of UnitedHealth Group, owners of the second-largest pharmacy benefit manager.

This is going to be a constant theme of the next four years. Personal business interests are going to constantly take precedence over governance in the Trump/Musk White House.

THE WORD FOR THIS IS OLIGARCHY, AND OLIGARCHS DON’T THINK OF THE COUNTRY FIRST. .

Millions of federal employees, including service members, won’t see paychecks over Christmas, national parks will be shut down, food inspections and countless other government functions will stop because a Elon Musk doesn’t want anyone poking around his business in China.“


Elon Musk blew up a near-complete bipartisan budget deal with an avalanche of tweets contending that it was too costly, luring Donald Trump into demanding that Republicans kill it. But Musk’s real reason—a story that David Dayen broke in the Prospect—was that the agreement included painstakingly negotiated limits on American tech investment in China. Had that provision passed, it would have been costly to Musk’s extensive Chinese Tesla operations and future AI plans.

In contrast to Trump, Musk played his hand in a way that made sure that he won his objective, and didn’t mind sacrificing Trump’s. In blessing the revised deal, which passed the House late Friday, 366-34, and the Senate, 85-11, Musk disingenuously praised Congress for drastically shrinking the total spending. This was total ********, since the budget numbers of the original deal and final one were almost identical. But shrinking spending wasn’t the goal: keeping the government out of his China business was.

In short, Musk outplayed Trump. Musk is not the sort of guy you can take to the woodshed. And the Inaugural is still a month away.

 
Last edited:
We should at least be aware that it will be tough to govern effectively in this Post Truth era….


The story of Babel is the best metaphor I have found for what happened to America in the 2010s, and for the fractured country we now inhabit. Something went terribly wrong, very suddenly. We are disoriented, unable to speak the same language or recognize the same truth. We are cut off from one another and from the past.

It’s been clear for quite a while now that red America and blue America are becoming like two different countries claiming the same territory, with two different versions of the Constitution, economics, and American history. But Babel is not a story about tribalism; it’s a story about the fragmentation of everything. It’s about the shattering of all that had seemed solid, the scattering of people who had been a community. It’s a metaphor for what is happening not only between red and blue, but within the left and within the right, as well as within universities, companies, professional associations, museums, and even families.
 
Hmm. New one to me….


Curtis Yarvin is hardly a household name in US politics. But the “neoreactionary” thinker and far-right blogger is emerging as a serious intellectual influence on key figures in Donald Trump’s coming administration in particular over potential threats to US democracy.

Yarvin, who considers liberal democracy as a decadent enemy to be dismantled, is intellectually influential on vice president-elect JD Vance and close to several proposed Trump appointees. The aftermath of Trump’s election victory has seen actions and rhetoric from Trump and his lieutenants that closely resemble Yarvin’s public proposals for taking autocratic power in America.

Trump’s legal moves against critics in the media, Elon Musk’s promises to pare government spending to the bone, and the deployment of the Maga base against Republican lawmakers who have criticized controversial nominees like Pete Hegseth are among the measures that resemble elements of Yarvin’s strategy for displacing liberal democracy in the US.
 


Busy beaver….


Sir Keir Starmer could introduce a new law to block Elon Musk from donating to Reform UK, a minister has suggested, saying the government will make sure the electoral system is protected from “many of the new issues that face undermining our democracy”.

The minister refusing to rule out the introduction of a law comes amid rumours the tech billionaire is preparing to donate $100m to Nigel Farage’s party – by far the largest contribution in British electoral history.

As a US citizen, Mr Musk cannot legally make a personal donation to a UK political party but he could do so through the UK subsidiaries of his companies.

 
Last edited:
Back
Top