What's new
By:

I want the Jazz to lose.

fishonjazz said:
Ah and you think that if the jazz tried to win all the games this season then these players would have playoff success.
I see why you are confused now.
Those players have been on non tanking teams in the past and had the same amount of playoff success as they are going to have on this tanking team.
Click to expand...
I said nothing of the sort.

You commented to @jazznik with a message tha paraphrased was: all those players need to just suck it up, lose, lose, and lose some more, because they have fat contracts so that's all they need.

Even though someone has made it into the NBA and signed massive contracts, doesn't mean they view that as success. Some might, doubt that Lauri & Collin do.
 
NAOS_pt2 said:
ok, it's semantics. But if you want to get semantic, then I said "proper tank", iirc.
Click to expand...
Yeah you're right about semantics. We sometimes talk past each other.

But when I hear "tank" I hear "(purposefully) lose to try to get good lotto odds" (and I think there's lots of threads, tweets, and other usage from around the NBA to back me up); I don't hear "properly manage a rebuild." I just don't think you're going to change my mind on this.
 
idiot said:
Yeah you're right about semantics. We sometimes talk past each other.

But when I hear "tank" I hear "(purposefully) lose to try to get good lotto odds" (and I think there's lots of threads, tweets, and other usage from around the NBA to back me up); I don't hear "properly manage a rebuild." I just don't think you're going to change my mind on this.
Click to expand...
Tanking is a strategy, and all strategies have a context. Talent acquisition, talent retention, and team building are that context.
 
Tanktastic said:
I said nothing of the sort.

You commented to @jazznik with a message tha paraphrased was: all those players need to just suck it up, lose, lose, and lose some more, because they have fat contracts so that's all they need.

Even though someone has made it into the NBA and signed massive contracts, doesn't mean they view that as success. Some might, doubt that Lauri & Collin do.
Click to expand...
Lauri literally choose to stay with this team that he knew was tanking lol.
If he wanted success in the way you think he does then he should have bounced.
 
Last edited:
This season is an absolute disgrace. It's pretty much killed any interest I've had in both the Jazz and the NBA, which is painful as watching the Jazz was a joyous occasion, even when they weren't good or could never reach the cusp of the championship.

Now it's pure unadulterated garbage out there, with a team actively trying to lose. I mean, I get the idea of tanking, but at this point why bother with playing these guys at all. Just forfeit every game, it would be less painful than the product on the court.
 
Nate505 said:
This season is an absolute disgrace. It's pretty much killed any interest I've had in both the Jazz and the NBA, which is painful as watching the Jazz was a joyous occasion, even when they weren't good or could never reach the cusp of the championship.

Now it's pure unadulterated garbage out there, with a team actively trying to lose. I mean, I get the idea of tanking, but at this point why bother with playing these guys at all. Just forfeit every game, it would be less painful than the product on the court.
Click to expand...
Would be pretty sweet if we could just forfeit every game tbh. Also would be nice to be able to fast forward the season.
 
NAOS_pt2 said:
Tanking is a strategy, and all strategies have a context. Talent acquisition, talent retention, and team building are that context.
Click to expand...
I'm really not sure what this means. "Talent acquisition, talent retention, and team building" are what every team tries to do. There's nothing exclusive to tanking about these.

Context implies the setting for something. These elements aren't the setting. They're part of the strategy. They have no special connection to tanking; they're strategies that all teams are involved with. There's nothing here to distinguish between tanking and non-tanking. I think it's more correct to say that tanking is a tactic within a larger strategy of talent acquisition, talent retention, and team building. It isn't a full-fledged strategy by itself.
 
For those who want to say that tanking is much broader than just purposive losing (to benefit in the draft), consider which types of the following sentences you've heard recently or that even make sense in normal usage:
  • "Our tank is going great, though we're not losing very much." (No one says this, except sarcastically)
  • "We've got 3 teams in the tank race this year: Washington, Utah, and Brooklyn. Everyone else with bad records is just bad. (You don't hear this because everyone who's bad is in the tank race regardless of what "strategy" with signings, acquisitions, cap space, etc. they're following).
  • "I wouldn't mind seeing Sexton on the next iteration of a winning Jazz team, but we need to trade him, so we can tank." (This one makes sense, because tanking's all about the win/loss record)
  • The 2022-23 Spurs were bad at tanking because 27-year old journeyman Keita Bates-Diop played in the second most games of all players and played the second-most minutes per game. (All that matters is they lost a lot and got Wemby in the draft after that season.)
  • "The Thunder kept Kenrich Williams because they were tanking." (No one says that, because keeping Kenrich Williams jeopardized their winning percentage. It would make much more sense to say that the Thunder kept Kenrich Williams in spite of their tanking."
  • "We're doing great at the tank because our youngsters are playing a major role in helping us win. (While the success of the youth might be solace if we had a .400 winning percentage, nobody would say this. It would be much more common to hear, "Our youngsters are too good; they're preventing us from tanking.")
In other words, tanking, in the way that we normally use the term, is all about the losing (especially in order to try to bolster the draft pick.)
 
Last edited:
This is a tough season because from a win loss perspective it is going great. Unfortunately from a player development standpoint it has been a serious mixed bag. We lose Hendricks right away so no development there and maybe never with that bad of an injury. Cody has been about as bad of a rookie as you can possibly. Key hasn't improved at all. On the bright side Brice, Collier and Flip are showing some flashes and Kessler seems to have shaken off his 2nd year slump. One thing that is crystal clear right now is that we desperately need that star wing and no one on our current roster can get to that level and it sure as hell isn't coming from free agency so the draft is our best shot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top