jom2003
Well-Known Member
What's in there for us? Two seconds isn't nearly enough for us to give up Collins AND Sexton plus we have no use for someone like Zach Collins & Keldon Johnson, both on very bad contracts.
Nvm it did say two seconds and two firsts but yeah I have the same question, it really depends on which two firsts we are gettingI ain’t saying no to that. Four firsts is pretty nuts for Fox, though, isn’t it? Are they counting the Charlotte pick as a 1st or two 2nds? ‘25 Hawks, ‘25 Chicago, then what? Spurs only have one *extra* 1st to trade after that cuz they ain’t trading that Wolves pick (yet). They do have like 20 2nds, though.
Ima shut up.
Is reading that hard for you. Two firstWhat's in there for us? Two seconds isn't nearly enough for us to give up Collins AND Sexton plus we have no use for someone like Zach Collins & Keldon Johnson, both on very bad contracts.
They get off contracts that don't have positive value as well.I ain’t saying no to that. Four firsts is pretty nuts for Fox, though, isn’t it? Are they counting the Charlotte pick as a 1st or two 2nds? ‘25 Hawks, ‘25 Chicago, then what? Spurs only have one *extra* 1st to trade after that cuz they ain’t trading that Wolves pick (yet). They do have like 20 2nds, though.
Ima shut up.
We have BriceI don't really know what to make of Keldon Johnson as a player. At one point he looked pretty promising. Huerter and Collins expire after next year, so they would make for good expirings in a bigger trade.
You could definitely rehab Huerter into being an asset for a contender who wants a rental shooter. Johnson is probably redundant to Brice as a player, from what I gather looking at stats.
Yeah but if Fox doesn't give you an assurance that he’ll re-sign and you’re giving up future picks, would you do the deal?Kings radio host for ESPN said the front office told Fox they had a deal for John Collins or Cam Johnson on the table. Both deals went cold and apparently was the last straw for Fox.