What's new

If, if, if?

actusreus

Well-Known Member
I know nobody can know, but if Walker were healthy, Nurk was playing like he is, and everyone else was playing every game (i.e., we were trying to win), is this a top 6 squad in this loaded West? Or would we still struggle to sniff the play in?
 
I know nobody can know, but if Walker were healthy, Nurk was playing like he is, and everyone else was playing every game (i.e., we were trying to win), is this a top 6 squad in this loaded West? Or would we still struggle to sniff the play in?
No, still not enough consistency among the back half of the rotation
 
I know nobody can know, but if Walker were healthy, Nurk was playing like he is, and everyone else was playing every game (i.e., we were trying to win), is this a top 6 squad in this loaded West? Or would we still struggle to sniff the play in?
I think we would firmly be in the play in but not 6 seed level.
 
I want to believe if we were trying to win that Harkless would be getting more run (back when he was healthy). I think a Keyonte, Harkless, Ace, Lauri, Kessler lineup could be at least average defensively.
 
Definitely a play in team but the defense would keep us from getting in the top 6.
 
If we take this group healthy next year and add some winning vets we could be a 6th seed. This year like many said I think we could be floating around .500 if we were trying to win and healthy. But who knows. We could be better if team morale was high and guys were feeling good. It's hard to tell when the team is obviously tanking. I think our defense would be much better with Kessler and trying to win.
 
Back
Top