let's just say that the 'real world' is corrupt enough that neither really works
This is simply not true.
let's just say that the 'real world' is corrupt enough that neither really works
my biggest gripe is the subsidy of Wall Street , the biggest parasites on the planet, which PKM I am guessing you are not part of.
Are you are a banker or loan officer, entrepreneur, or what?
This is simply not true.
I'm so not in the mood to debate this topic, so forgive me .. But please tell me one place we can funnel dollars to that is void of corruption.
my biggest gripe is the subsidy of Wall Street , the biggest parasites on the planet, which PKM I am guessing you are not part of, especially since you say you are lending your own money.
Are you are a banker or loan officer, entrepreneur, venture capitalist, or what?
I am currently accepting donations...
The money should go into the economy at large.
- food stamps (no room to suggest corruption? You don't think this empowers people to just sit? Not stereotyping .. so don't go there)- unemployment benefits (see above)
- schooling (if handled properly, YES!
- jobs programs (defined by? This another potential good one)
- public infrastructure (TONS of corruption, both by corporations and government .. first hand knowledge)
If anything, in times of crisis like 2008, the rich should be more than willing to pay for the government stimulus that saved their margins from going negative or businesses outright collapsing.
Facts:
1. All sports team owners are subsidized.
2. All sports owners are rich.
3. Many cities have republican governments.
Conclusion: Republicans support subsidies, IF (and only if) they are for rich people.
Your logic is faulty. Based on your "facts" there is no way to determine whether Repubs do or do not support subsidies for poor people.
Who is the 'rich?' Those that directy received bail-out should pay it back .. 100%. The rich in general, though, shouldn't have to pay in anymore (as a %) than anyone else, imo.
My logic is not faulty. i did not say what you said I said in the quote you quoted.Your logic is faulty. Based on your "facts" there is no way to determine whether Repubs do or do not support subsidies for poor people.